首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Effects of dispatcher-initiated telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide, population-based, cohort study
【24h】

Effects of dispatcher-initiated telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide, population-based, cohort study

机译:调度员启动的电话心肺复苏后的效果在医院外心脏骤停后:全国范围内,基于人口,队列队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of dispatcher-initiated telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (TCPR) in Japan using a nationwide population-based registry. Methods: Adult Japanese patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA; n = 582,483, age >18years) were selected from a nationwide Utstein style database (2010-2016) and divided into 3 groups: no bystander CPR (NCPR) before emergency medical service arrival (n = 448,606), bystander initiated CPR (BCPR) performed without assistance (n = 46,964), and TCPR (n = 86,913). The primary outcome was a favourable neurological outcome 1 month after OHCA. Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, and relative to the NCPR group, significantly better 1-month neurological outcomes were observed in the BCPR group (odds ratio: 2.25, 95% confidence interval: 2.15-2.36; P< 0.001) and in the TCPR group (odds ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.36; P< 0.001). The collapse-to-CPR time was independently associated with the 1-month outcomes, with a rate of <1 % for 1-month favourable neurological outcomes if CPR was initiated >5 min after the collapse. Conclusion: Patients who received TCPR had significantly better outcomes than those who did not receive CPR. However, the TCPR outcomes were less favourable than those in the BCPR group. Better protocol development and enhanced education are needed to improve dispatcher instructions in Japan, which may help lessen the gap between the BCPR and TCPR outcomes and further improve the outcomes after OHCA.
机译:目的:本研究旨在使用全国范围的基于人口的注册处调查日本调度员发起的电话心肺复苏(TCPR)的影响。方法:从全国Utstein风格数据库(2010-2016)中选择了医院外逮捕(OHCA; N = 582,483岁)的日本患者,并分为3组:之前没有旁观者CPR(NCPR)紧急医疗服务到达(n = 448,606),旁观者启动的CPR(BCPR)在没有辅助的情况下进行(n = 46,964)和TCPR(n = 86,913)。 ohca后1个月的主要结果是一个有利的神经系统结果。结果:调整潜在混凝剂后,相对于NCPR组,在BCPR组中观察到1个月的1个月神经原因(差距:2.25,95%:2.15-2.36; P <0.001)和在TCPR组(差距:1.30,95%置信区间1.24-1.36; p <0.001)。崩溃至CPR时间与1个月的结果独立相关,如果在崩溃后启动CPR> 5分钟,则为1个月有利的神经学结果的速率<1%。结论:接受TCPR的患者比没有收到CPR的人具有明显更好的结果。然而,TCPR结果比BCPR组的特点较低。需要更好的协议开发和增强的教育,以改善日本的调度员指令,这可能有助于减少BCPR和TCPR结果之间的差距,并在OHCA后进一步改善结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号