首页> 外文期刊>Law and human behavior: The official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society >Current Status of Forensic Lie Detection With the Comparison Question Technique: An Update of the 2003 National Academy of Sciences Report on Polygraph Testing
【24h】

Current Status of Forensic Lie Detection With the Comparison Question Technique: An Update of the 2003 National Academy of Sciences Report on Polygraph Testing

机译:对比较问题技术的法医说谎检测现状:2003年全国科学院关于测谎仪测试报告的更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fifteen years have elapsed since a report was released by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) on the scientific status of polygraph testing. The NAS report concluded that the scientific basis of the comparison question technique (CQT) was weak, the extant research was of low quality, the polygraph profession's claims for the high accuracy of the CQT were unfounded, and, although the CQT has greater than chance accuracy, its error rate is unknown. Polygraph proponents argue that current research indicates that the CQT has 90% or better accuracy, the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences' (2003) analysis supports this accuracy claim, and the CQT qualifies as legally admissible scientific evidence. We review the scientific literature that has appeared since the appearance of the NAS publication, including a new method for estimating polygraph accuracy. We show that the NAS report has been misrepresented and misinterpreted by those who support use of the CQT in forensic settings. We conclude that the quality of research has changed little in the years elapsing since the release of the NAS report, and that the report's landmark conclusions still stand.
机译:自国家科学院(NAS)发布以来,自大十五岁以来经过了一份报告,从传染码照片测试的科学状态下发布。 NAS报告的结论是,比较问题技术(CQT)的科学依据薄弱,现存的研究具有低质量,功率高精度的索赔毫无根据,虽然CQT大于机会准确性,其错误率未知。传染镜头支持者认为,目前的研究表明,国家科学院国家研究委员会(2003年)分析的国家研究委员会支持这种准确性索赔,CQT有90%或更高的准确性,并符合法律允许的科学证据。我们审查了自NAS出版物外观以来出现的科学文献,包括一种估算测距精度的新方法。我们表明NAS报告一直被支持在法医设置中使用CQT的人误解并误解了。我们得出结论,自NAS报告释放以来的几年来研究的研究质量很大,并且报告的标志标准结论仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号