首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing using a satellite-based geographically and temporally weighted regression model
【24h】

Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing using a satellite-based geographically and temporally weighted regression model

机译:使用基于卫星的地理上和时间加权回归模型估算北京地面PM2.5浓度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most time-sequenced ambient air pollution data in China is published through daily Air Quality Index (AQI). However, few studies have used the AQI data to calibrate satellite-based estimates of fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particles no greater than 2.5 mu m in aerodynamic diameter) concentrations, partly because the AQI-derived PM2.5 is not continuously obtained each day. Taking Beijing as an example, we developed a geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) model that can account for spatial and temporal variability in the relationship between the non-continuous AQI-derived PM2.5 and satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD). The GTWR model, which uses AOD values with a 3-km spatial resolution obtained from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), meteorological fields, and land-use variables as predictors, was fitted seasonally from April 2013 to March 2015. After being cross-validated against ground observations, the coefficient of determination (R-2) of PM2.5 ranged from 0.36 to 0.75, with a mean value of 0.58. The GTWR model outperforms several conventional models, such as the multiple linear regression (MLR) model, geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, temporally weighted regression (TWR) model, and linear mixed-effects (LME) model. Compared to a previous spatiotemporal model, the two-stage (LME + GWR) model, the GTWR model may be more feasible. When the number of daily records is >= 5, there is no obvious difference in prediction accuracy (cross-validated R-2 both valued at 0.68). However, when the number of daily records is <5, the GTWR model performs much better (cross-validated R-2 of 0.45 and 0.08). Our estimates indicate that the gridded annual mean PM2.5 values range from 62 to 110 mu g/m(3), denoting strong spatial variation. We find that when available, continuous daily PM2.5 observations can significantly improve model performance and therefore facilitate the estimation of surface PM2.5 concentrations at urban scales. The GTWR model may serve as a reference for studying regions where continuous air pollution data are limited. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:中国的大多数时间测序环境空气污染数据是通过日常空气质量指数(AQI)发表的。然而,很少有研究使用AQI数据来校准基于卫星的细颗粒物质(PM2.5,颗粒在空气动力学直径中不大于2.5μm)浓度的基于卫星的估计值,部分地是因为不连续获得AQI衍生的PM2.5每天。以北京为例,我们开发了一个地理上和时间加权回归(GTWR)模型,可以考虑非连续AQI衍生的PM2.5和卫星衍生的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)之间的关系中的空间和时间变异性。使用从适度分辨率成像分光镜(MODIS),气象领域和土地使用变量获得的3公里的空间分辨率的GTWR模型作为预测因素,从2013年4月到2015年3月季节性上批准。交叉后 - 反对地面观察,PM2.5的测定系数(R-2)范围为0.36至0.75,平均值为0.58。 GTWR模型优于几种传统模型,例如多线性回归(MLR)模型,地理加权回归(GWR)模型,时间加权回归(TWR)模型和线性混合效应(LME)模型。与先前的时空模型相比,两级(LME + GWR)模型,GTWR模型可能更加可行。当每日记录的数量为> = 5时,预测精度没有明显的差异(在0.68的交叉验证的R-2两者之间值)。但是,当日常记录的数量<5时,GTWR模型执行更好(交叉验证的R-2为0.45和0.08)。我们的估计表明,网格年度平均PM2.5值范围为62至110μm(3),表示强的空间变化。我们发现,当可用时,连续每日PM2.5观察可能会显着提高模型性能,从而有助于在城市尺度上估算表面PM2.5浓度。 GTWR模型可以作为研究连续空气污染数据有限的区域的参考。 (c)2017年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号