首页> 外文期刊>Research in nursing & health >Conducting surveys with multidisciplinary health care providers: Current challenges and creative approaches to sampling, recruitment, and data collection
【24h】

Conducting surveys with multidisciplinary health care providers: Current challenges and creative approaches to sampling, recruitment, and data collection

机译:通过多学科医疗保健提供者进行调查:当前挑战和创造性的采样,招聘和数据收集方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Surveys represent one of the most common and useful ways to collect self‐reported data on a wide variety of topics and from a diversity of respondents, including health care providers (HCPs). Unfortunately, survey response rates have been declining for decades; surveys with HCPs often yield response rates of 40% or less. Another major challenge in surveys with HCPs arises from difficulties in identifying appropriate sampling frames. The lack of appropriate sampling frames is particularly problematic when trying to survey multiple types of HCPs or those who work in unusual practice settings or specialties. The purpose of this paper is to describe the current challenges to survey research with college HCPs who are members of multidisciplinary care teams, and propose alternative approaches to sampling and data collection. An exemplar is provided in which three different approaches to sampling, recruitment and data collection were undertaken with a multidisciplinary sample of college HCPs. The three approaches are compared in terms of response rates, costs, and sample characteristics. Differences were noted in effort, response rates, and sample characteristics. Respondents recruited from professional organization mailing lists were disproportionately from smaller, private college/universities, as compared with those recruited from colleges/universities selected from a U.S. Department of Education list. However, no differences in variables of interest were found between the three samples, reducing concerns of potential bias. Developing best practices for surveying multiple types of HCPs will become increasingly important as we seek to better understand current care processes and plan implementation studies to promote the adoption of practice recommendations.
机译:摘要调查代表了收集各种主题的自我报告数据以及包括医疗保健提供者(HCP)的多样性的最常见数据的最常见数据之一。不幸的是,调查响应率几十年已经下降; HCP的调查通常会产生40%或更低的响应率。在识别适当的采样框架时,HCP的调查中的另一个主要挑战产生了困难。当尝试调查多种类型的HCP或在不寻常的实践环境或特色时,缺乏适当的采样帧尤其有问题。本文的目的是描述与大学HCPS调查研究的当前挑战,他是多学科护理团队成员,并提出了对抽样和数据收集的替代方法。提供了一种示例,其中通过大学HCP的多学科样本进行了三种不同的采样,招聘和数据收集方法。在响应率,成本和样本特征方面进行比较这三种方法。在努力,响应率和样本特征中注意到差异。与专业的组织邮件列表中招募的受访者与较小的私立学院/大学的招募人员不成比例,与从美国教育名单中的大学/大学招募的人相比。然而,在三个样本之间发现了兴趣变量的差异,从而减少了潜在偏差的担忧。开发测量多种类型HCP的最佳实践将越来越重要,因为我们寻求更好地了解当前的护理流程并计划实施研究,以促进培​​养实践建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号