首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Feeding strategies and shade type for growing cattle grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue
【24h】

Feeding strategies and shade type for growing cattle grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue

机译:饲养策略和种植牛种植牛群放牧内心感染的高菲舍斯

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two experiments were conducted to determine animal performance of alternative feeding strategies to heifers grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue during summer months. In Experiment 1, 40 Limousin heifers (261 (40) kg initial BW) were stratified by weight and assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Diet factors were either a spring harvested tall fescue silage diet fed ad libitum in grass traps (Silage) or grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue pasture with grain supplement (Grain; 2.1 kg DM hd(-1) d(-1)), and shade factors were either natural (NAT; trees) or artificial (ART; 13.38 m(2)/pasture of 80% shade cloth) shade for 80 days. In Experiment 2, 40 Limousin heifers (277(44) kg initial BW) were stratified by weight and assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Diet factors were either a traditional grain supplement (Control) or feather-meal supplement (FM) while grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue pasture, and shade factors were either NAT or ART shade for 98 days. Control and FM supplements provided an estimated 56 and 175 mg metabolizable arginine/kg BW, respectively. Heifers were weighed on two consecutive days at the start and end of each experiment. In Experiment 1, weight gain of heifers was greater (P < 0.05) in Grain than Silage treatments (0.55 vs. 0.13 kg/d) and was greater (P < 0.05) for NAT than ART shade (0.39 vs. 0.29 kg/d). cost of gain was greater (P < 0.05) for heifers fed Silage than Grain (7.26 vs. 1.56 $/kg of gain). in Experiment 2, there was no difference (P > 0.10) in weight gain or cost of gain between Control and FM supplements. Heifers with NAT shade had a greater (P < 0.05) weight gain (0.74 vs. 0.65 kg/d) and lower (P < 0.05) cost of gain (2.01 vs. 2.27 $/kg of gain) than ART shade. In conclusion, feeding early-spring harvested tall fescue silage or a supplement with high metabolizable arginine did not improve performance, and current recommendations for design of artificial shade structures may not be adequate for cattle grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue during summer.
机译:进行了两次实验,以确定在夏季期间放牧内心感染的高杂散的小母牛的替代喂养策略的动物表现。在实验1中,40次耐磷酸素仔裤(261(40)kg初始Bw)重量分层,并以2×2的治疗排列分配给4个处理中的4个处理。饮食因素要么是春天收获的高弗雷斯青贮饲料喂养陷阱(青贮饲料)或用谷物补充剂(谷物; 2.1kg DM HD(-1)D(-1))和遮阳因子是天然(NAT;树木)或人工(艺术; 13.38米(2)/牧场的80%遮阳布)阴影80天。在实验2中,40个鞋粉大母牛(277(477(44)kg初始BW)重量分层,并以2×2因子的治疗排列分配给4个处理中的1个。饮食因素是传统的谷物补充(控制)或羽扇粉补充剂(FM),同时放牧内心感染的高紫外线牧场,遮阳因子是NAT或ART SHADE 98天。对照和FM补充剂分别提供了估计的56和175mg代谢的精氨酸/ kg BW。在每个实验的开始和结束时连续两天称重小母牛。在实验1中,小母牛的重量增长比青贮处理更大(P <0.05)(0.55与0.13kg / d),NAT比艺术阴影更大(P <0.05)(0.39 Vs.0.29kg / d )。对青贮饲喂青贮饲料的收益成本大于谷物(7.26 vs.1.56 $ /千克收益)。在实验2中,对照和FM补充剂之间的重量增益或增益没有差异(p> 0.10)。带NAT阴影的小母牛具有更大(P <0.05)的重量增益(0.74 vs.0.65 kg / d),降低(P <0.05)增益(2.01与2.27 $ / kg收益)比艺术阴影更高。总之,早期春季收获的高毛坯青贮或补充具有高代谢精氨酸的补充并未改善性能,并且目前的人工遮阳结构设计的建议可能不适合夏季放牧的牛群感染的高射击。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Livestock Science》 |2019年第2019期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Missouri State Univ William H Darr Coll Agr Dept Anim Sci 901 S Natl Ave Springfield MO 65897 USA;

    Missouri State Univ William H Darr Coll Agr Dept Agribusiness Agr Educ &

    Commun 901 S Natl Ave Springfield MO 65897 USA;

    Missouri State Univ William H Darr Coll Agr Dept Environm Plant Sci &

    Nat Resources 901 S Natl Ave Springfield MO 65897 USA;

    Missouri State Univ William H Darr Coll Agr Dept Anim Sci 901 S Natl Ave Springfield MO 65897 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 家畜;
  • 关键词

    Tall fescue; Ergot alkaloids; Arginine; Beef cattle; Shade;

    机译:高弗雷斯;麦角生物碱;精氨酸;牛肉;阴影;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号