首页> 外文期刊>Rangeland Ecology & Management >Grazing History Effects on Rangeland Biomass, Cover and Diversity Responses to Fire and Grazing Utilization
【24h】

Grazing History Effects on Rangeland Biomass, Cover and Diversity Responses to Fire and Grazing Utilization

机译:放牧历史影响对牧场生物量,覆盖和多样性对火灾和放牧利用的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Exclusion of large grazers from rangelands that evolved with significant grazing pressure can alter natural processes and may have legacy effects by changing magnitude or direction of community responses to subsequent disturbance. Three moderately grazed pastures were paired with 12-ha areas with 15 yr of livestock exclusion. Six treatments were assigned to each in a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of fire (fall fire or no fire) and grazing utilization (0%, 50%, or 75% biomass removal) to determine grazing history effects on rangeland response to subsequent disturbance. Livestock exclusion increased C3perennial grass (1 232 vs. 980 ± 50 kg ? ha-1) and forbs (173 vs. 62 ± 19 kg ? ha-1) and reduced C4perennial grass (36 vs. 180 ± 25 kg ? ha-1) with no effect on total current-year biomass. Diversity was greater in pastures than exclosures (H’ = 1.5400 vs. 1.3823 ± 0.0431). Every biomass, cover, and diversity measure, except subshrub biomass, was affected by fire, grazing utilization, or both. Contrary to expectations, grazing history only interacted with fire effects for old standing dead material and interactions with grazing utilization were limited to old dead, bare ground, richness and dominance. Fire by grazing utilization interaction was limited to bare ground. Fire reduced annual grass (64 vs. 137 ± 29 kg ? ha-1), forbs (84 vs. 133 ± 29 kg ? ha-1), and diversity (H’ = 1.3260 vs. 1.5005 ± 0.0537) with no difference in total current-year biomass (1 557 vs. 1 594 ± 66 kg ? ha-1). Grazing to 75% utilization reduced total current-year biomass (1 467 vs. 1 656 ± 66 kg ? ha-1) and dominance (0.4824 vs. 0.5584 ± 0.0279). Grazing history affected starting points for most variables, but changes caused by grazing utilization or fire were similar between pastures and exclosures, indicating management decisions can be made based on independent knowledge of grazing or fire effects.
机译:从牧场中排除大型地域,随着显着的放牧压力演变,可以改变自然过程,并且可以通过改变社区反应的幅度或方向来具有遗留效果,以随后的干扰。三个中度放牧的牧场与12公顷的地区配对,牲畜排除15年。分配了六种治疗方法,每个治疗方法为2 x 3因子的火灾(坠落火灾或火灾)和放牧利用率(0%,50%,或75%的生物量移除),以确定对牧场对随后干扰的响应的放牧历史影响。牲畜排除增加C3Perennial草(1 232 vs.980±50 kg?ha-1)和Forbs(173 vs.62±19 kg?ha-1)和减少C4perennial草(36 vs.180±25kg?ha-1 )没有对当年总生物质的影响。牧场的多样性比排射更大(H'= 1.5400与1.3823±0.0431))。除子表生物量外,每个生物质,覆盖和多样性度量,受到火灾,放牧利用率或两者的影响。与期望相反,放牧历史只与旧的常设死亡材料的消防效应和与放牧利用的相互作用仅限于老死,裸地,丰富和优势。通过放牧利用互动的火灾仅限于裸露的地面。火灾减少年度草(64对137±29公斤?HA-1),FORB(84与133±29公斤?HA-1),多样性(H'= 1.3260与1.5005±0.0537)没有差异总年度生物量(1 557 vs.1 594±66千克?HA-1)。放牧到75%的利用率减少了当量总生物量(1 467 Vs.1 656±66千克ΔHa-1)和优势(0.4824与0.5584±0.0279)。放牧历史影响了大多数变量的起点,但是通过放牧利用率或火灾引起的变化与牧场和排水之间相似,表明管理决定可以基于放牧或火灾效应的独立知识进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号