首页> 外文期刊>Landscape Ecology >Weak effects of farming practices corresponding to agricultural greening measures on farmland bird diversity in boreal landscapes
【24h】

Weak effects of farming practices corresponding to agricultural greening measures on farmland bird diversity in boreal landscapes

机译:农业绿化措施对北方景观农田鸟类多样性的耕作实践的弱势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

ContextThe current Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union includes three greening measures, which are partly intended to benefit farmland biodiversity. However, the relative biodiversity effects of the greening measures, including joint effects of landscape context, are not well understood.ObjectivesWe studied the effects of increasing crop diversity, proportions of production grasslands and fallows, corresponding to CAP greening measures, on open farmland bird diversity, whilst controlling for the effects of distance to forests, field edge density and proportion of built-up areas.MethodsWe surveyed open farmland birds using territory mapping in Southern Finland. We modelled effects of greening measures and landscape structure on farmland birds (7642 territories) using generalised linear mixed models.ResultsIncreasing proportions of grasslands increased farmland bird species richness and diversity in open farmland, whereas increasing proportions of fallows increased bird diversity. Increasing crop diversity benefited individual species, but not species richness or diversity. Increasing field edge densities consistently increased the species richness of all farmland species, in-field nesters and non-crop nesters, as well as total farmland bird diversity. The relative effect of edge density was much stronger compared to the three greening measures.ConclusionsOur results show that promoting fallows and grasslands, in particular grazed grasslands and various types of semi-natural grasslands, has the highest potential to benefit farmland bird diversity. Maintaining or increasing field edge densities, currently not supported, seems to be of even more benefit. In open farmland, with little or no field edges, fallows and grasslands are particularly beneficial.
机译:背景信息欧洲联盟的当前常见农业政策(上限)包括三种绿化措施,部分旨在使农田生物多样性受益。然而,绿化措施的相对生物多样性效应,包括景观环境的联合影响,并不能够很好地理解。对应于帽绿化措施,对相应的作物多样性,生产草地和休耕的比例进行了影响,对应于盖子绿化措施,研究了对相应的作物多样性,对应于盖帽绿化措施的影响。虽然控制距离森林,田间边缘密度和建筑区域比例的影响。芬兰南部使用领土测绘的地区测绘了公开农田鸟类的近景。我们采用广义线性混合模型对绿化措施和景观结构的建模效果增加作物多样性使个体物种受益,但不是物种丰富或多样性。越来越多的领域边缘密度始终增加了所有农田的物种丰富性,现场嵌套和非作物嵌套,以及农田总鸟类多样性。与三种绿化措施相比,边缘密度的相对效果要强烈。结论调节结果表明,促进休耕和草原,特别是放牧的草原和各种类型的半天然草原,具有充分利用农田鸟类多样性的最高潜力。目前不支持的维护或增加现场边缘密度似乎更有利。在开放的农田里,缺乏或没有田间边缘,休耕和草原特别有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号