首页> 外文期刊>Learning & behavior >To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?
【24h】

To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?

机译:啄或不啄:鸽子更喜欢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Animals are expected to minimize time and effort to reinforcement. Thus, not pecking should be preferred over pecking. However, even if time is held constant, pigeons often peck when it is allowed but not required (e.g., fixed time schedules), but with such schedules pecking may be adventitiously reinforced. In the present experiment, to better compare a schedule of reinforcement that requires pecking with one that requires the absence of pecking, we compared a modified fixed-interval (FI) schedule in which reinforcement follows the first peck after the interval has elapsed and a differential-reinforcement-of-other behavior (DRO) schedule, which requires pigeons to abstain from pecking for a similar interval. The delay to reinforcement was matched on a trial-by-trial basis by yoking the duration of the FI to match the DRO schedule that preceded it. Of 12 pigeons, six preferred the DRO schedule over the FI schedule and six did not show a schedule preference. Those that were indifferent between the schedules apparently had a stronger spatial preference than their schedule preference. Individual differences in the preference of the pigeons may have been related to their behavior during the DRO schedule.
机译:预计动物将最大限度地减少加强的时间和努力。因此,在啄食时,不会啄食。然而,即使时间保持恒定,鸽子通常会在允许但不需要时啄(例如,固定时间表),但是,这种时间表可能会被视为增强。在目前的实验中,为了更好地比较需要啄食需要啄食的加强时间表,我们比较了修改的固定间隔(FI)时间表,其中在间隔经过的间隔之后,加固遵循第一个啄食 - 侵入的其他行为(DRO)时间表,需要鸽子避免啄食类似的间隔。通过展示FI的持续时间来匹配前面的DRO时间表的试验基础符合延迟。在12只鸽子中,六个首选DRO日程安排,六个没有显示时间表偏好。那些在时间表之间无动于衷的人显然具有比他们的日程偏好更强的空间偏好。鸽子偏好的个体差异可能与它们在DRO时间表期间的行为有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号