...
首页> 外文期刊>Leadership in health services >Bringing voice in policy building A cross-population multi-stakeholder conceptual model for management of acute unscheduled care in the United States using group concept mapping
【24h】

Bringing voice in policy building A cross-population multi-stakeholder conceptual model for management of acute unscheduled care in the United States using group concept mapping

机译:利用集团概念映射,在美国建立跨人类多利益相关者概念模型的政策中的语音

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of group concept mapping (GCM) as a tool for developing a conceptual model of an episode of acute, unscheduled care from illness or injury to outcomes such as recovery, death and chronic illness. Design/methodology/approach - After generating a literature review drafting an initial conceptual model, GCM software (CS Global MAX?) is used to organize and identify strengths and directionality between concepts generated through feedback about the model from several stakeholder groups: acute care and non-acute care providers, patients, payers and policymakers. Through online and in-person population-specific focus groups, the GCM approach seeks feedback, assigned relationships and articulated priorities from participants to produce an output map that described overarching concepts and relationships within and across subsamples. Findings - A clustered concept map made up of relational data points that produced a taxonomy of feedback was used to update the. model for use in soliciting additional feedback from two technical expert panels (TEPs), and finally, a public comment exercise was performed. The results were a stakeholder-informed improved model for an acute care episode, identified factors that influence process and outcomes, and policy recommendations, which were delivered to the Department of Health and Human Services's (DHHS) Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. Practical implications - This study provides an example of the value of cross-population multi-stakeholder input to increase voice in shared problem health stakeholder groups. Originality/value - This paper provides GCM results and a visual analysis of the relational characteristics both within and across sub-populations involved in the study. It also provides an assessment of observational key factors supporting how different stakeholder voices can be integrated to inform model development and policy recommendations.
机译:目的 - 本文的目的是描述使用组概念测绘(GCM)作为开发急性急性,未经疾病的概念模型的工具,从疾病或损伤恢复,死亡和慢性疾病等结果。设计/方法/方法 - 生成文献综述起草初始概念模型后,GCM软件(CS Global Max?)用于组织和识别通过反馈产生的关于来自几个利益相关者群体的模型的概念之间的优势和方向性:急性护理和非急性护理提供者,患者,付款人和政策制定者。通过在线和人口特定的焦点小组,GCM方法寻求来自参与者的反馈,分配的关系和铰接式优先级,以生成一个输出地图,用于描述内部和跨越副页的总体概念和关系。调查结果 - 由产生反馈分类的关系数据点组成的集群概念地图用于更新。用于征求两种技术专家面板(TEPS)的额外反馈的模型,最后进行了公众评论练习。结果是急性护理集团的利益相关者知情的改进模型,确定了影响过程和结果的因素,以及将卫生部和人类服务部(DHHS)助理秘书部门的准备和答复部提供的政策建议。实际意义 - 本研究提供了跨人类多利益相关者投入的价值的例子,以增加共享问题卫生利益相关者群体中的语音。原创性/值 - 本文提供了GCM结果和研究中涉及的子群体内部的关系特征的视觉分析。它还提供了对支持不同利益攸关方声音的观察关键因素的评估,以便为模式开发和政策建议提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号