首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and Urban Planning >Understanding disparities in community green accessibility under alternative green measures: A metropolitan-wide analysis of Columbus, Ohio, and Atlanta, Georgia
【24h】

Understanding disparities in community green accessibility under alternative green measures: A metropolitan-wide analysis of Columbus, Ohio, and Atlanta, Georgia

机译:替代绿色措施理解社区绿色可访问性的差异:对哥伦布,俄亥俄州和亚特兰大,格鲁吉亚的大都市范围分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines whether the level of community accessibility to green spaces varies as a function of socioeconomic factors, focusing on three underexplored aspects affecting green inequity assessment implications of alternative green measures, spatial non-stationarity of socioeconomic impacts, and regional/local context. Using six green measures involving general greenness, tree canopy, developed open space, agricultural lands, parks, green trails, golf courses and sports fields, Geographically Weighted Regression models are developed, and coefficient surfaces are created and compared over two metropolitan areas, Columbus and Atlanta. Second-order effects among individual factors are tested to explore synergistic linkages among them. The results show that the identified patterns of green access inequity vary significantly with the selected green measure. In both metropolitan areas, access to parks, green trails, golf and sports fields turns out to be spatially independent from general greenness and tree canopies. GWR coefficient surfaces show that the socioeconomic-green relationships are spatially heterogeneous and context-dependent, affected by a complex web of forces, including urban heritage, racial and lifestyle diversity, and natural landscape. While natural landscape and income have greater effects in Columbus, racial disparity is dominant in Atlanta. Income-driven disparities are most visible in inner suburban areas and tend to abate in the urban core and exurbs. Urban greening programs need to diversify in terms of green type and location to address localized deficits over a wide urban spectrum.
机译:本研究审查了对绿色空间的社区可行性水平随着社会经济因素的函数而变化,重点关注影响替代绿色措施的绿色不平等评估影响的三个过度偏远的方面,社会经济影响的空间非公平性和区域/地方背景。使用六种绿色措施,涉及全球绿色,树冠,开发的开放空间,农业用地,公园,绿色踪迹,高尔夫球场和运动场,开发了地理加权回归模型,并在两个大都市区,哥伦布和哥伦布地区进行了系数表面。亚特兰大。测试各种因素的二阶效应是测试其中的探讨它们之间的协同联系。结果表明,所确定的绿色访问模式与所选择的绿色措施相差显着变化。在大都市区,进入公园,绿色踪迹,高尔夫和运动场,从而自然独立于一般的绿色和树木檐篷。 GWR系数表面表明,社会经济 - 绿色关系是空间异构和上下文相关的,受到复杂的力量的影响,包括城市遗产,种族和生活方式多样性和自然景观。虽然在哥伦布的自然景观和收入具有更大的影响,但种族差距在亚特兰大占主导地位。内部郊区的收入驱动的差异在城区最可见,往往会削减城市核心和evurbs。城市绿化方案需要在绿色类型和地理位置方面多样化,以解决广泛的城市频谱的本地化赤字。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号