...
首页> 外文期刊>Lancet Neurology >Stage at which riluzole treatment prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from a dose-ranging study
【24h】

Stage at which riluzole treatment prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from a dose-ranging study

机译:Riluzole治疗患者患有肌营养的外侧硬化症的患者的阶段:来自Dose-Ranging研究的数据回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license ? 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Background: Riluzole is the only drug to prolong survival for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and, at a dose of 100 mg, was associated with a 35% reduction in mortality in a clinical trial. A key question is whether the survival benefit occurs at an early stage of disease, late stage, or is spread throughout the course of the disease. To address this question, we used the King's clinical staging system to do a retrospective analysis of data from the original dose-ranging clinical trial of riluzole. Methods: In the original dose-ranging trial, patients were enrolled between December, 1992, and November, 1993, in Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Canada, the USA, and the UK if they had probable or definite ALS as defined by the El Escorial criteria. The censor date for the riluzole survival data was set as the original study end date of Dec 31, 1994. For this analysis, King's clinical ALS stage was estimated from the electronic case record data of the modified Norris scale, UK Medical Research Council score for muscle strength, El Escorial category, vital capacity, and gastrostomy insertion data. The lowest allocated stage was 2 because the original trial only included patients with probable or definite ALS. We used a χ 2 test to assess the independence of stage at trial enrolment and treatment group, Kaplan-Meier product limit distribution to test the transition from each stage to subsequent stages, and Cox regression to confirm an effect of treatment group on time in stage, controlling for covariates. We did sensitivity analyses by combining treatment groups, using alternative strategies to stage, stratifying by stage at trial enrolment, and using multistate outcome analysis of treatments (MOAT). Findings: We analysed the case records of all 959 participants from the original dose-ranging trial, 237 assigned to 50 mg/day riluzole, 236 to 100 mg/day, 244 to 200 mg/day, and 242 to daily placebo. Clinical stage at enrolment did not significantly differ between treatment groups (p=0·22). Time in stage 4 was longer for patients receiving 100 mg/day riluzole than for those receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·36–0·83; log-rank p=0·037). Combining treatment groups and stratifying by stage at enrolment showed a similar result (HR 0·638, 95% CI 0·464–0·878; p=0·006), as did analysis with MOAT where the mean number of days spent in stage 4 was numerically higher for patients given riluzole at higher doses compared with patients receiving placebo. Time from stages 2 or 3 to subsequent stages or death did not differ between riluzole treatment groups and placebo (p=0·83 for stage 2 and 0·88 for stage 3). Interpretation: We showed that riluzole prolongs survival in the last clinical stage of ALS; this finding needs to be confirmed in a prospective study, and treatment effects at stage 1 still need to be analysed. The ALS stage at which benefit occurs is important for counselling of patients before starting treatment. Staging should be used in future ALS clinical trials to assess the stage at which survival benefit occurs, and a similar approach could be used for other neurodegenerative diseases. Funding: NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, The European Union Joint Programme on Neurodegeneration, and the King's Summer Undergraduate Studentship. Background: Riluzole is the only drug to prolong survival for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and, at a dose of 100 mg, was associated with a 35% reduction in mortality in a clinical trial. A key question is whether the survival benefit occurs at an early stage of disease, late stage, or is spread throughout the course of the disease. To address this question, we used the King's clinical staging system to do a retrospective analysis of data from the original
机译:还2018年作者。由elsevier有限公司出版。这是CC下的开放式访问文件4.0牌照? 2018年作者。由elsevier有限公司出版。这是CC下的开放式检修文件4.0许可证背景:Riluzole是唯一延长肌萎缩侧面硬化(ALS)的存活的药物,并且在100毫克的剂量下,与减少35%有关在临床试验中的死亡率。一个关键问题是在疾病的早期阶段发生生存效果,或在整个疾病过程中传播。为了解决这个问题,我们使用国王的临床分期系统,从原始剂量范围的瑞唑临床试验开始对数据进行回顾性分析。方法:在原有的剂量范围试验中,患者于1992年12月,1993年12月,在比利时,法国,法国,德国,西班牙,加拿大,美国和英国,如果他们有可能或明确的als EL ESS ESCORIAL标准。 Riluzole生存数据的审查日期被设定为1994年12月31日的原始研究结束日期。对于此分析,国王的临床ALS阶段估计了英国医学研究委员会评分的改良诺里斯规模的电子案例记录数据肌肉力量,el eScorial类别,生命能力和胃造口插入数据。最低分配的阶段为2,因为原始试验仅包括有可能或明确的ALS患者。我们使用了一项试验来评估试用注册和治疗组的阶段的独立性,Kaplan-Meier产品限制分布,测试从每个阶段到后续阶段的过渡,以及Cox回归,以确认在阶段时间按时对治疗组的影响,控制协变者。我们通过组合治疗组进行敏感性分析,使用替代策略在阶段,在试验招生期间分层,并利用对治疗的多态结果分析(护城河)。结果:我们分析了所有959名参与者的案例记录,将所有959名参与者从原始剂量范围的试验中分配到50毫克/天瑞鲁唑,236〜100毫克/天,244至200毫克/天,242至每日安慰剂。在注册的临床阶段在治疗组之间没有显着差异(P = 0·22)。阶段4的时间较长,患者较长,患者接受100毫克/天的瑞鲁唑比接受安慰剂(危害比[HR] 0·55,95%CI 0·36-0·83; log-andal p = 0·037)。结合治疗组并在注册时阶段分层显示出类似的结果(HR 0·638,95%CI 0·464-0·878; P = 0·006),以及武器的分析在其中所花费的平均天数与接受安慰剂的患者相比,患者患者阶段4对riluzole较高的患者进行数值更高。从阶段2或3到后续阶段或死亡的时间在瑞洛唑治疗组和安慰剂之间没有差异(P = 0·83,阶段2和阶段3的0·88)。解释:我们表明Riluzole延长了ALS的最后临床阶段的生存;需要在前瞻性研究中确认此发现,并且仍需要分析第1阶段的治疗效果。发生效果的ALS阶段对于开始治疗前的患者是重要的。应在将来的ALS临床试验中使用分期来评估发生生存效果的阶段,并且类似的方法可用于其他神经变性疾病。资金:NIHR Maudsley生物医学研究中心,欧盟神经变性联合计划,国王夏季本科学生。背景:Riluzole是延长肌营养的外侧硬化(ALS)的唯一延长生存的药物,并且在100毫克的剂量下,临床试验中的死亡率降低35%。一个关键问题是在疾病的早期阶段发生生存效果,或在整个疾病过程中传播。为了解决这个问题,我们使用国王的临床分期系统来从原始的数据进行回顾性分析

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号