首页> 外文期刊>Nursing in critical care >Health care professionals' concerns regarding in‐hospital family‐witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation implementation into clinical practice
【24h】

Health care professionals' concerns regarding in‐hospital family‐witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation implementation into clinical practice

机译:医疗保健专业人员对临床实践中医院家庭目睹心肺重新扫描实施的担忧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACT Background In‐hospital, family‐witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults has been found to help patients' family members deal with the short‐ and long‐term emotional consequences of resuscitation. Because of its benefits, many national and international nursing and medical organizations officially recommend this practice. Research, however, shows that family‐witnessed resuscitation is not widely implemented in clinical practice, and health care professionals generally do not favour this recommendation. Aim To describe and provide an initial basis for understanding health care professionals' views and perspectives regarding the implementation of an in‐hospital, family‐witnessed adult resuscitation practice in two European countries. Study design An inductive qualitative approach was used in this study. Methods Finnish ( n ?=?93) and Polish ( n ?=?75) emergency and intensive care nurses and physicians provided written responses to queries regarding their personal observations, concerns and comments about in‐hospital, family‐witnessed resuscitation of an adult. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings The study analysis yielded five themes characterizing health care professionals' main concerns regarding family‐witnessed resuscitation: (1) family's horror, (2) disturbed workflow (3) no support for the family, (4) staff preparation and (5) situation‐based decision. Conclusion Despite existing evidence revealing the positive influence of family‐witnessed resuscitation on patients, relatives and cardiopulmonary resuscitation process, Finnish and Polish health care providers cited a number of personal and organizational barriers against this practice. The results of this study begin to examine reasons why family‐witnessed resuscitation has not been widely implemented in practice. In order to successfully apply current evidence‐based resuscitation guidelines, provider concerns need to be addressed through educational and organizational changes. Relevance to clinical practice This study identified important implementation barriers for allowing families in critical care settings to be present during resuscitation efforts. These results can be further used in developing and adjusting clinical practice policies, protocols and guidelines related to family‐witnessed resuscitation.
机译:摘要背景中,家庭目睹成人的家人心肺复苏,帮助患者的家庭成员处理复苏的短期和长期情绪后果。由于其利益,许多国家和国际护理和医疗组织正式推荐这种做法。然而,研究表明,家庭目击的复苏在临床实践中并未广泛实施,医疗保健专业人员一般不赞成此建议。旨在描述并为理解医疗保健专业人员的观点和观点来描述和为有关在欧洲国家的一家内部,家庭见证的成人复苏实践的实施的观点和观点提供最初的基础。研究设计本研究中使用了一种感应定性方法。方法方法芬兰语(n?= 93)和抛光(n?=?75)紧急和重症监护护士和医生为有关其个人观察,担忧和评论的疑问提供了书面答复,为医院内部,家庭目睹成年人复苏的疑问。使用归纳专题分析进行分析数据。调查结果研究分析产生了五个主题,表征了医疗保健专业人员关于家庭目睹复苏的主要关切:(1)家庭的恐怖,(2)干扰工作流程(3)没有支持家庭,(4)员工准备和(5)局面基于决定。结论尽管现有证据表明家庭目睹家庭目睹对患者,亲属和心肺复苏过程的积极影响,但芬兰和波兰医疗保健提供者引用了一些针对这种做法的个人和组织障碍。本研究的结果开始审查为什么家庭目睹的复苏在实践中未得到广泛实施的原因。为了成功应用当前的基于证据的复苏指南,需要通过教育和组织变更来解决提供者的担忧。与临床实践的相关性本研究确定了在复苏努力期间允许在关键护理环境中允许家庭的重要实施障碍。这些结果可以进一步用于开发和调整与家庭目睹复苏相关的临床实践政策,协议和指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号