首页> 外文期刊>Nursing ethics >Dignity in long-term care
【24h】

Dignity in long-term care

机译:长期护理中的尊严

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The concept of dignity is recognised as a fundamental right in many countries. It is embedded into law, human rights legislation and is often visible in organisations’ philosophy of care, particularly in aged care. Yet, many authors describe difficulties in defining dignity and how it can be preserved for people living in long term care. Objectives: In this article, Nordenfelt’s ‘four notions of dignity’ are considered, drawing on research literature addressing the different perspectives of those who receive, observe or deliver care in the context of the long-term care environment. Methods: A review of the literature was undertaken using the terms ‘nursing homes’, ‘residential care’ or ‘long-term care’. The terms were combined and the term ‘human dignity’ was added. A total of 29 articles met the inclusion criteria from the United Kingdom (14), United States (2), Australia (1), Sweden (3), Hong Kong (2), Norway (3), Nordic (1), Taiwan (1), Netherlands (1). Ethical Considerations: Every effort has been made to ensure an unbiased search of the literature with the intention of an accurate interpretation of findings. Discussion: The four notions of dignity outlined by Nordenfelt provide a comprehensive description of the concept of dignity which can be linked to the experiences of people living in long-term care today and provide a useful means of contextualising the experiences of older people, their families and significant others and also of staff in long-term care facilities. Of particular interest are the similarities of perspectives of dignity between these groups. The preservation of dignity implies that dignity is a quality inherent in us all. This links directly to the exploration and conclusions drawn from the literature review. Conversely, promoting dignity implies that dignity is something that can be influenced by others and external factors. Hence, there are a number of implications for practice. Conclusion: We suggest that two of Nordenfelt’s notions, ‘dignity of identity’ and ‘dignity of Menschenwüde’, are a common thread for residents, family members and staff when conceptualising dignity within long-term care environments.
机译:背景:尊严的概念被认为是许多国家的基本权利。它嵌入法律,人权立法,并且在组织的护理哲学中经常可见,特别是在老年护理中。然而,许多作者描述了定义尊严的困难以及如何为生活在长期护理中的人们保存。目标:在本文中,诺登福尔的“四个概念的尊严”被考虑在研究文献中,借鉴了在长期护理环境中接受,观察或提供护理的人的不同观点。方法:使用“护理家园”,“住宅护理”或“长期护理”进行了对文献的综述。这些术语被组合,并加入了“人尊严”一词。共有29篇文章符合英国(14),美国(2),澳大利亚(1),瑞典(3),香港(2),挪威(3),北欧(1),北欧(1),台湾的纳入标准(1),荷兰(1)。道德考虑因素:已经努力确保对文献的无偏见搜索,以意图准确地解释调查结果。讨论:Nordenfelt概述的四个尊严概念提供了尊严的概念的综合描述,这些尊重概念可以与今天长期护理的人们的经验联系,并提供了语境中的有用手段,以便语境中的老年人,他们的家庭的体现和重要的其他人和长期护理设施的工作人员。特别感兴趣的是这些群体之间尊严的观点的相似之处。保存尊严意味着尊严是我们所有人所固有的一种质量。这一链接直接从文献综述中汲取的探索和结论。相反,促进尊严意味着尊严是可能受到他人和外部因素的影响。因此,有许多对实践的影响。结论:我们建议诺登福威尔的概念,“尊严的身份”和“默认的尊重”,是居民,家庭成员和工作人员在长期护理环境中识别尊严时的共同主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号