...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews >More than just noise: Inter-individual differences in fear acquisition, extinction and return of fear in humans - Biological, experiential, temperamental factors, and methodological pitfalls
【24h】

More than just noise: Inter-individual differences in fear acquisition, extinction and return of fear in humans - Biological, experiential, temperamental factors, and methodological pitfalls

机译:不仅仅是噪音:恐惧滥用,灭绝和人类恐惧的恐惧的间间差异 - 生物,体验,缘因素和方法论缺陷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Highlights ? Inter-individual differences in fear conditioning were mostly regarded as ‘ noise ’. ? However, inter-individual differences carry meaningful information. ? We provide a broad overview on inter-individual differences in fear conditioning. ? Relevant biological, experiential and temperamental factors will be discussed. ? Accompanying methodological pitfalls for study design and analyses will be given. Abstract Why do only some individuals develop pathological anxiety following adverse events? Fear acquisition, extinction and return of fear paradigms serve as experimental learning models for the development, treatment and relapse of anxiety. Individual differences in experimental performance were however mostly regarded as ‘ noise ’ by researchers interested in basic associative learning principles. Our work for the first time presents a comprehensive literature overview and methodological discussion on inter-individual differences in fear acquisition, extinction and return of fear. We tell a story from noise that steadily develops into a meaningful tune and converges to a model of mechanisms contributing to individual risk/resilience with respect to fear and anxiety-related behavior. Furthermore, in light of the present ‘replicability crisis’ we identify methodological pitfalls and provide suggestions for study design and analyses tailored to individual difference research in fear conditioning. Ultimately, synergistic transdisciplinary and collaborative efforts hold promise to not only improve our mechanistic understanding but can also be expected to contribute to the development of specifically tailored (‘individualized’) intervention and targeted prevention programs in the future.
机译:强调 ?恐惧条件的个体间差异主要被视为“噪音”。还但是,个人间差异携带有意义的信息。还我们在恐惧调理中提供了广泛的差异概述。还将讨论相关的生物,体验和缘因素。还伴随着研究设计和分析的方法缺陷。摘要为什么只有一些人会在不良事件后发展病理焦虑?恐惧习得,灭绝和恐惧案件作为焦虑的发展,治疗和复发的实验学习模式。然而,实验性能的个体差异主要被对基本联想学习原则感兴趣的研究人员视为“噪音”。我们首次工作提出了全面的文学概述和方法论讨论,就恐惧收购,灭绝和恐惧返回的个体间差异。我们讲述一个故事,稳定地发展成一个有意义的调整,并融合到有助于恐惧和焦虑相关行为的个人风险/弹性的机制模型。此外,根据目前的“可重量性危机”,我们识别方法陷阱,并为恐惧调节中针对个体差异研究量身定制的研究设计和分析提供了建议。最终,协同跨学科和协作努力不仅可以提高机械认识,而且还可以有望为未来专门定制(“个人化”)干预和有针对性的预防计划的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号