首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >α-blockers, antibiotics and anti-inflammatories have a role in the management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.
【24h】

α-blockers, antibiotics and anti-inflammatories have a role in the management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

机译:α受体阻滞剂,抗生素和抗炎药在慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的治疗中具有重要作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Type - Therapy (systematic review) Level of Evidence 1a. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Individual clinical trials evaluating antibiotics, anti-inflammatories and α-blockers for the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome have shown only modest or even no benefits for patients compared with placebo, yet we continue to use these agents in selected patients with some success in clinical practice. This network meta-analysis of current evidence from all available randomized placebo-controlled trials with similar inclusion criteria and outcome measures shows that these '3-As' of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome treatment (antibiotics, anti-inflammatories and α-blockers) do offer benefits to some patients, particularly if we use them strategically in selected individuals.To provide an updated network meta-analysis mapping α-blockers, antibiotics and anti-inflammatories (the 3-As) in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). ? To use the results of this meta-analysis to comment on the role of the 3-As in clinical practice.We updated a previous review including only randomized controlled studies employing the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) as one of the outcomes to compare treatment effects in CP/CPPS patients. ? A longitudinal mixed regression model (network meta-analysis) was applied to indirectly assess multiple treatment comparisons (i.e. α-blockers, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory/immune modulation therapies, α-blockers plus antibiotics, and placebo).Nineteen studies (1669 subjects) were eligible for analysis. ? α-blockers, antibiotics and anti-inflammatory/immune modulation therapies were associated with significant improvement in symptoms when compared with placebo, with mean differences of total CPSI of -10.8 (95% CI -13.2 to -8.3; P < 0.001), -9.7 (95% CI -14.2 to -5.3; P < 0.001) and -1.7 (95% CI -3.2 to -0.2; P= 0.032) respectively, while α-blockers plus antibiotics resulted in the greatest CPSI difference (-13.6, 95% CI -16.7 to -10.6; P < 0.001). ? With respect to responder analysis compared with placebo, anti-inflammatories showed the greatest response rates (risk ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1; P < 0.001) followed by α-blockers (risk ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8; P= 0.013) and antibiotics (risk ratio 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-1.9; P= 0.527).α-blockers, antibiotics and/or anti-inflammatory/immune modulation therapy appear to be beneficial for some patients with CP/CPPS. ? The magnitude of effect and the disconnect between mean CPSI decrease and response rates compared with placebo suggest that directed multimodal therapy, rather than mono-therapy, with these agents should be considered for optimal management of CP/CPPS.
机译:研究类型-治疗(系统评价)的证据水平1a。关于这个主题有什么了解?该研究增加了什么?评估抗生素,抗炎药和α受体阻滞剂用于治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔痛综合征的个别临床试验显示,与安慰剂相比,该药对患者的益处仅是中度甚至没有,但我们仍在某些患者中继续使用这些药物在临床实践中取得成功。该网络对来自所有可用的随机安慰剂对照试验的当前证据进行的网络荟萃分析,具有相似的纳入标准和结果指标,表明这些慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔痛综合征治疗的“ 3-As”(抗生素,抗炎药和α受体阻滞剂) )确实为某些患者带来了好处,特别是如果我们在特定人群中策略性地使用它们的话。提供针对慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征中α受体阻滞剂,抗生素和抗炎药(3-As)的最新网络荟萃分析(CP / CPPS)。 ?为了使用这项荟萃分析的结果来评论3-As在临床实践中的作用,我们更新了以前的评论,其中仅包括以美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)为指标的随机对照研究结果比较CP / CPPS患者的治疗效果。 ?应用纵向混合回归模型(网络荟萃分析)间接评估多种治疗方案的比较(即,α-受体阻滞剂,抗生素,抗炎/免疫调节疗法,α-受体阻滞剂加抗生素和安慰剂)。十九项研究(1669名受试者) )有资格进行分析。 ?与安慰剂相比,α受体阻滞剂,抗生素和抗炎/免疫调节疗法与症状显着改善相关,总CPSI的平均差异为-10.8(95%CI -13.2至-8.3; P <0.001),-分别为9.7(95%CI -14.2至-5.3; P <0.001)和-1.7(95%CI -3.2至-0.2; P = 0.032),而α受体阻滞剂加抗生素导致的CPSI差异最大(-13.6, 95%CI -16.7至-10.6; P <0.001)。 ?与安慰剂相比,在应答者分析中,抗炎药的应答率最高(风险比1.7,95%CI 1.4-2.1; P <0.001),其次是α受体阻滞剂(风险比1.4,95%CI 1.1-1.8; P <0.001)。 P = 0.013)和抗生素(风险比1.2,95%CI 0.7-1.9; P = 0.527)。α阻滞剂,抗生素和/或抗炎/免疫调节疗法似乎对某些CP / CPPS患者有益。 ?与安慰剂相比,效果的严重程度以及平均CPSI降低和反应率之间的脱节表明,应考虑使用这些药物进行定向多式治疗而非单药治疗,以实现CP / CPPS的最佳治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号