...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuromodulation: journal of the International Neuromodulation Society >Nonlinear Relation Between Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Amplitude and Behavioral Outcome in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
【24h】

Nonlinear Relation Between Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Amplitude and Behavioral Outcome in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

机译:脉冲背根神经节刺激振幅和疼痛性外周神经病变实验模型之间的非线性关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and objective Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) has recently emerged as a neuromodulation modality in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of different Burst‐DRGS amplitudes in an experimental model of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). Methods Diabetes mellitus was induced in female Sprague–Dawley rats by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, n =?28). Animals were tested for mechanical hypersensitivity (von Frey paw withdrawal test) before, and four?weeks after STZ injection. PDPN rats ( n =?13) were implanted with a unilateral bipolar electrode at the L5 DRG. Animals received Burst‐DRGS at 0%, 10%, 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% of motor threshold (MT) in a randomized crossover design on post‐implantation days 2–7 ( n =?9). Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed before stimulation onset, 15 and 30?min during stimulation, and 15 and 30?min after stimulation. Results Burst‐DRGS at amplitudes of 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% MT resulted in significant attenuation of STZ‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity at 15 and 30?min during stimulation, as well as 15?min after cessation of stimulation. No effect on mechanical hypersensitivity was observed for Burst‐DRGS at 0% MT and 10% MT. Optimal pain relief and highest responder rates were achieved with Burst‐DRGS at 50–66% MT, with an estimated optimum at 52% MT. Conclusion Our findings indicate a nonlinear relationship between Burst‐DRGS amplitude and behavioral outcome, with an estimated optimal amplitude of 52% MT. Further optimization and analysis of DRGS driven by insights into the underlying mechanisms related to the various stimulation paradigms is warranted.
机译:背景和目标背根神经节刺激(DRG)最近被出现为治疗慢性神经性疼痛的神经调节方式。本研究的目的是比较不同突发-DRG幅度在疼痛糖尿病外周神经病变(PDPN)的实验模型中的疗效。方法通过腹膜内注射链脲佐菌素(STZ,N = 28),在雌性Sprague-Dawley大鼠中诱导糖尿病。在STZ注射液之前测试了动物的机械超敏反应(Von Frey Paw释放试验),并进行了测试。将PDPN大鼠(n =α13)植入L5 DRG的单侧双极电极。动物在植入后2-7天(n = 9)的随机交叉设计中,在随机交叉设计中获得0%,10%,33%,50%,66%和80%的80%的突发频率阈值(MT)(n =Δ9)。在刺激期间,在刺激期间,在刺激期间15和30≤min之前评估机械超敏反应,刺激后15和30?分钟。结果在33%,50%,66%和80%MT的振荡中突发-DRG在刺激期间在15和30?分钟内显着衰减,在刺激后,15?分钟,刺激停止后15?分钟。对于0%MT和10%MT的裂纹DRG,观察到对机械超敏反应的影响。在50-66%MT的突发-DRG中实现最佳疼痛缓解和最高响应率,估计为52%MT。结论我们的研究结果表明突发-DRGS幅度和行为结果之间的非线性关系,估计最佳幅度为52%。有必要进一步优化和分析DRG的洞察驱动的潜在机制与各种刺激范式相关的潜在机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号