...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuromodulation: journal of the International Neuromodulation Society >Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome: Outcome of a Prospective Case Series
【24h】

Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome: Outcome of a Prospective Case Series

机译:脊髓刺激治疗颈部手术失败综合征:未来案例系列的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an accepted, cost‐effective treatment option for a variety of chronic pain syndromes, including failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). The application of SCS in the cervical spine, particularly for pain after cervical spine surgery, has been drawn into question in recent years by payers due to a purported lack of clinical evidence. To challenge this claim, we analyzed data from a prospective registry to support the use of SCS in the cervical spine for pain after spine surgery. Materials and Methods Data from the EMPOWER and PAIN registries were analyzed on patients diagnosed with pain after neck surgery (C‐FBSS) for the following outcomes: patient reported percent pain relief (PRPR), pain disability index (PDI), quality of life (QoL), and satisfaction at 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month post‐implantation. Statistical analysis was provided for all measures. Results Fifteen patients with C‐FBSS were successfully implanted with SCS leads in the cervical spine. PRPR was 65.2%, 62.4%, and 71.9% at 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month post‐implantation, respectively. PDI scores were significantly reduced from baseline (51.21–23.70 at 12 months, p ?=?0.001). At one‐year post‐implantation, the average overall QoL was reported to be improved/greatly improved and patient satisfaction was rated satisfied/greatly satisfied. Conclusions For many, the application of SCS in the neck for pain after surgery is based on the obvious similarities to FBSS or anecdotal experience rather than published data. The data contained herein suggest SCS for C‐FBSS is an effective therapy that improves QoL and patient satisfaction, as well as decreasing pain and PDI. The use of successful application of neurostimulation as a therapy has largely been predicated on the principles of patient selection, implantation technique, and stimulation parameters. As such, SCS would appear to be an appropriate and valid treatment for C‐FBSS that requires further study and investigation to make additional recommendations.
机译:目标脊髓刺激(SCS)是各种慢性疼痛综合征的可接受的,经济效益的治疗选择,包括失败的背部手术综合征(FBS)。由于缺乏临床证据,近年来,近年来,宫颈脊柱中SCS在颈椎中的应用,特别是在宫颈脊柱手术后的疼痛。为挑战这一索赔,我们分析了从预期登记处的数据,以支持脊柱手术后颈椎在颈椎中的使用。对颈部手术(C-FBSS)诊断疼痛的患者进行了授权和疼痛注册表的材料和方法数据:患者报告疼痛缓解百分比(PRPR),疼痛残疾指数(PDI),生活质量( QoL),并在3-,6-和12个月的植入后的满意度。为所有措施提供了统计分析。结果成功植入了C-FBS的十五名患者,颈椎中的SCS引线。 PRPR分别为35.2%,62.4%,分别为35.2%,62.4%和71.9%,分别在植入后3个,6-9个月。 PDI评分从基线显着降低(51.21-23.70,在12个月,p?= 0.001)。在一年的植入后,据报道,普通的整体QOL被提高/大大提高,患者满意度满足/大满满意。结论许多,手术后颈部SCS在疼痛中的应用是基于与FBSS或轶事经验而非公布数据的明显相似性。本文所含的数据表明C-FBSS的SCS是一种有效的治疗,可提高QoL和患者满意度,以及降低疼痛和PDI。使用成功应用神经刺激作为治疗的应用主要是关于患者选择,植入技术和刺激参数的原理。因此,SCS似乎是对需要进一步研究和调查的C-FBS的适当和有效的治疗,以提出额外的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号