...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurocritical care >Rural-Urban Disparities in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Mortality in the USA: Preliminary Findings from the National Inpatient Sample
【24h】

Rural-Urban Disparities in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Mortality in the USA: Preliminary Findings from the National Inpatient Sample

机译:美国脑出血死亡率的农村城市差异:国家住院样品的初步调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives To compare in-hospital mortality between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients in rural hospitals to those in urban hospitals of the USA. Methods We used the National Inpatient Sample to retrospectively identify all cases of ICH in the USA over the period 2004-2014. We used multivariable-adjusted models to compare odds of mortality between rural and urban hospitals. Joinpoint regression was used to evaluate trends in age- and sex-adjusted mortality in rural and urban hospitals over time. Results From 2004 to 2014, 5.8% of ICH patients were admitted in rural hospitals. Rural patients were older (mean [SE] 76.0 [0.44] years vs. 68.8 [0.11] years in urban), more likely to be white and have Medicare insurance. Age- and sex-adjusted mortality was greater in rural hospitals (32.2%) compared to urban patients (26.5%) (p value < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, patients hospitalized in rural hospitals had two times the odds of in-hospital death compared to patients in urban hospitals (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.77-2.41. p value < 0.001). After joinpoint regression, mortality declined in urban hospitals by an average of 2.8% per year (average annual percentage change, [AAPC] - 2.8%, 95% CI - 3.7 to - 1.8%), but rates in rural hospitals remained unchanged (AAPC - 0.54%, 95% CI - 1.66 to 0.58%). Conclusions Despite current efforts to reduce disparity in stroke care, ICH patients hospitalized in rural hospitals had two times the odds of dying compared to those in urban hospitals. In addition, the ICH mortality gap between rural and urban centers is increasing. Further studies are needed to identify and reverse the causes of this disparity.
机译:目标可以比较农村医院脑出血(ICH)患者与美国城市医院的患者之间的住院死亡率。方法我们利用国民住院性样品回顾性地确定2004 - 2014年期间所有ICH的案例。我们使用多变量调整的模型来比较农村和城市医院之间死亡率的几率。加入点回归用于评估农村和城市医院的年龄和性别调整后的死亡率的趋势随着时间的推移。结果2004年至2014年,5.8%的ICH患者在农村医院录取。农村患者年龄较大(均值[SE] 76.0 [0.44]年与城市中的68.8年[0.11]),更有可能是白色的并且有Medicare保险。与城市患者相比,农村医院的年龄和性别调整的死亡率更大(32.2%)(26.5%)(P值<0.001)。多变量调整后,与城市医院的患者(或2.07,95%CI 1.77-2.41)相比,农村医院住院的患者与住院死亡的可能性有两倍.P值<0.001)。在加入回归之后,城市医院的死亡率平均下降2.8%(平均年度百分比变化,[AAPC] - 2.8%,95%CI - 3.7至-1.8%),但农村医院的利率保持不变(AAPC - 0.54%,95%CI - 1.66至0.58%)。结论尽管目前正在努力减少中风护理的差异,但农村医院住院的ICH患者与城市医院的患者有两倍的消亡的几率。此外,农村和城市中心之间的ICH死亡率差距正在增加。需要进一步的研究来识别和扭转这种差异的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号