首页> 外文期刊>Neurocritical care >What Families Need and Physicians Deliver: Contrasting Communication Preferences Between Surrogate Decision-Makers and Physicians During Outcome Prognostication in Critically Ill TBI Patients
【24h】

What Families Need and Physicians Deliver: Contrasting Communication Preferences Between Surrogate Decision-Makers and Physicians During Outcome Prognostication in Critically Ill TBI Patients

机译:什么家庭需要和医生提供:在批评性患者的成果预后,替代决策者和医生之间的沟通偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Background Surrogate decision-makers (“surrogates”) and physicians of incapacitated patients have different views of prognosis and how it should be communicated, but this has not been investigated in neurocritically ill patients. We examined surrogates’ communication preferences and physicians’ practices during the outcome prognostication for critically ill traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) patients in two level-1 trauma centers and seven academic medical centers in the USA. Methods We used qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics of transcribed interviews to identify themes in surrogates ( n ?=?16) and physicians ( n ?=?20). Results The majority of surrogates (82%) preferred numeric estimates describing the patient’s prognosis, as they felt it would increase prognostic certainty, and limit the uncertainty perceived as frustrating. Conversely, 75% of the physicians reported intentionally omitting numeric estimates during prognostication meetings due to low confidence in family members’ abilities to appropriately interpret probabilities, worry about creating false hope, and distrust in the accuracy and data quality of existing TBI outcome models. Physicians felt that these models are for research only and should not be applied to individual patients. Surrogates valued compassion during prognostication discussions, and acceptance of their goals-of-care decision by clinicians. Physicians and surrogates agreed on avoiding false hope. Conclusion We identified fundamental differences in the communication preferences of prognostic information between ciTBI patient surrogates and physicians. These findings inform the content of a future decision aid for goals-of-care discussions in ciTBI patients. If validated, these findings may have important implications for improving communication practices in the neurointensive care unit independent of whether a formal decision aid is used.
机译:抽象背景替代决策者(“替代品”)和无能量患者的医生对预后的看法以及应如何传达,但这尚未在神经分子病患者中进行调查。我们在两级1级创伤中心和美国七个学术医疗中心的批评性创伤性脑损伤(葡萄花族)患者的成果预后,审查了代理人的沟通偏好和医生的实践。方法采用定性内容分析和转录访谈的描述性统计,以识别代理人的主题(n?=?16)和医生(n?=?20)。结果大多数代理人(82%)优选的数字估计描述患者预后,因为它们觉得它会增加预后确定性,并限制不确定性被认为是令人沮丧的。相反,75%的医生由于家庭成员能力对适当解释概率的低信任而故意省略在预后会议期间的数字估计,担心创造虚假希望,并在现有TBI结果模型的准确性和数据质量方面不信任。医生认为这些模型仅用于研究,不应该适用于个体患者。在预后讨论期间替代尊重慈悲,并通过临床医生接受他们的护理目标。医生和代理人同意避免虚假希望。结论,我们确定了斯花翠患者替代物和医生之间预后信息的通信偏好的根本差异。这些调查结果告知CITBI患者的未来决策援助的内容。如果验证,这些发现可能对改善神经监护单元中的通信实践无关,这些发现可能具有重要意义,这些方法无论是否使用正式决策援助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号