首页> 外文期刊>Neurocritical care >Predictors of Intraspinal Pressure and Optimal Cord Perfusion Pressure After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
【24h】

Predictors of Intraspinal Pressure and Optimal Cord Perfusion Pressure After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

机译:创伤脊髓损伤后锚管压力和最佳帘线灌注压力的预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background/ObjectivesWe recently developed techniques to monitor intraspinal pressure (ISP) and spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) from the injury site to compute the optimum SCPP (SCPPopt) in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). We hypothesized that ISP and SCPPopt can be predicted using clinical factors instead of ISP monitoring.MethodsSixty-four TSCI patients, grades A-C (American spinal injuries association Impairment Scale, AIS), were analyzed. For 24h after surgery, we monitored ISP and SCPP and computed SCPPopt (SCPP that optimizes pressure reactivity). We studied how well 28 factors correlate with mean ISP or SCPPopt including 7 patient-related, 3 injury-related, 6 management-related, and 12 preoperative MRI-related factors.ResultsAll patients underwent surgery to restore normal spinal alignment within 72h of injury. Fifty-one percentage had U-shaped sPRx versus SCPP curves, thus allowing SCPPopt to be computed. Thirteen percentage, all AIS grade A or B, had no U-shaped sPRx versus SCPP curves. Thirty-six percentage (22/64) had U-shaped sPRx versus SCPP curves, but the SCPP did not reach the minimum of the curve, and thus, an exact SCPPopt could not be calculated. In total 5/28 factors were associated with lower ISP: older age, excess alcohol consumption, nonconus medullaris injury, expansion duroplasty, and less intraoperative bleeding. In a multivariate logistic regression model, these 5 factors predicted ISP as normal or high with 73% accuracy. Only 2/28 factors correlated with lower SCPPopt: higher mean ISP and conus medullaris injury. In an ordinal multivariate logistic regression model, these 2 factors predicted SCPPopt as low, medium-low, medium-high, or high with only 42% accuracy. No MRI factors correlated with ISP or SCPPopt.ConclusionsElevated ISP can be predicted by clinical factors. Modifiable factors that may lower ISP are: reducing surgical bleeding and performing expansion duroplasty. No factors accurately predict SCPPopt; thus, invasive monitoring remains the only way to estimate SCPPopt.
机译:背景/玻美灯近最近开发了从损伤部位监测脊柱压力(ISP)和脊髓灌注压力(SCPP)的技术,以计算急性创伤脊髓损伤(TSCI)患者的最佳SCPP(SCPPOPT)。我们假设ISP和SCPPOPT可以使用临床因素而不是ISP监测预测。分析了A-C(美国脊柱伤害协会损伤量表,AIS)等级,X-Cixty-四个TSCI患者。手术后24小时,我们监控ISP和SCPP和Computed SCPPOPT(SCPP,优化压力反应性)。我们研究了28个因素与平均ISP或SCPPOPT相关的因素有多相关,包括7例相关的3个伤害相关的6个管理相关和12个术前的MRI相关因素。患者接受手术的患者在损伤72小时内恢复正常脊柱对准。五十一百分比具有U形SPRX与SCPP曲线,从而允许计算SCPPOPT。十三个百分比,所有AIS级A或B,没有U形SPRX与SCPP曲线。三十六个百分比(22/64)具有U形SPRX与SCPP曲线,但SCPP没有达到曲线的最小值,因此,无法计算精确的SCPPOPT。总共5/28因素与较低的ISP有关:年龄较大的年龄,多余的酒精消费,非髓质损伤,扩张多骨术和术中出血。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,这5个因素预测ISP正常或高,精度为73%。只有2/28因素与较低的SCPPOPT相关:更高的平均ISP和Conus Medullaris损伤。在序数多变量逻辑回归模型中,这2个因素将SCPPOPT预测为低,中低,中高,或高,只有42%的精度。没有与ISP或SCPPOPT相关的MRI因子。可以通过临床因素来预测Conclusionselevated ISP。可降低ISP的可修饰因素是:减少手术出血和表演膨胀术。没有因素准确预测scppopt;因此,侵入性监测仍然是估计SCPPOPT的唯一方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号