...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurobiology of learning and memory >Differential effects of unipolar versus bipolar depression on episodic memory updating
【24h】

Differential effects of unipolar versus bipolar depression on episodic memory updating

机译:单极与双极性抑郁对情节内存更新的差异影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Episodic memories, when reactivated, can be modified or updated by new learning. Since such dynamic memory processes remain largely unexplored in psychiatric disorders, we examined the impact of depression on episodic memory updating. Unipolar and bipolar depression patients, and age/education matched controls, first learned a set of objects (List-1). Two days later, participants in all three groups were either reminded of the first learning session or not followed by the learning of a new set of objects (List-2). Forty-eight hours later, List-1 recall was impaired in unipolar and bipolar patients compared to control participants. Further, as expected, control participants who received a reminder spontaneously recalled items from List-2 during recall of List-1, indicative of an updated List-1 memory. Such spontaneous intrusions were also seen in the unipolar and bipolar patients that received the reminder, suggesting that memory updating was unaffected in these two patient groups despite impaired recall of List 1. Unexpectedly, we observed a trend towards higher intrusions, albeit statistically insignificant, not only in the reminder but also in the no-reminder subgroups of bipolar patients. We probed this further in a second cohort by testing recall of List-2, which was also impaired in both depression groups. Again bipolar patients showed intrusions, but this time in the reverse order from List-1 into List-2, independent of a reminder. Taken together, despite impaired recall, updating of episodic memories was intact and unidirectional in unipolar depression. In contrast, indiscriminate updating, as evidenced by bidirectional interference between episodic memories, was seen in bipolar depression. These findings reveal a novel distinction between unipolar versus bipolar depression using a reactivation-dependent memory updating paradigm.
机译:重新激活时,episodic记忆可以通过新学习来修改或更新。由于这种动态内存过程在精神疾病中仍然很大程度上是未开发的,因此我们检查了抑郁症对焦虑记忆更新的影响。单极和双极抑郁症患者,以及年龄/教育匹配的控制,首先学习了一套物体(列表1)。两天后,所有三个群体的参与者都被提醒了第一个学习会议,而不是学习一组新的对象(列表-2)。与对照参与者相比,在单极和双极患者中,列表-1召回的列表 - 1召回召开。此外,正如预期的那样,在召回列表-1期间,在列表-1期间,控制参与者从列表-2期间从列表-2开始召回项目,指示更新的列表-1内存。在未获得提醒的单极和双极患者中也观察到这种自发性入侵,表明记忆更新在这两个患者群体中不受影响,尽管列出的召回障碍1.出乎意料地,我们观察到更高的入侵趋势,尽管统计上微不足道,但不是只有在提醒中,还在双极患者的无提醒子组中。通过测试列表-2的召回,我们在第二次队列中进一步探讨了这一点,这在抑郁症组中也受损。再次双极患者展示入侵,但这次以列表-1的相反顺序排成列表-2,与提醒无关。尽管召回的召回障碍,但在单极抑郁症中更新的耻辱记忆的更新是完整和单向的。相比之下,在Pipolar Despression中观察到难以置有的更新,这是由脑外记忆之间的双向干扰所证明的。这些发现揭示了使用Reactivation依赖的记忆更新范式的单极与双极凹陷之间的新颖区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号