首页> 外文期刊>NDT & E International: Independent Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation >Comparison of time and frequency domain features' immunity against lift-off in pulse-compression eddy current imaging
【24h】

Comparison of time and frequency domain features' immunity against lift-off in pulse-compression eddy current imaging

机译:脉冲压缩涡流成像中的时间和频率域特征对剥离的抗扰的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reports a comparison between imaging procedures based on time-and frequency-domain features applied to eddy current data collected on an Aluminium alloy benchmark sample. Both the defect detection capability and the immunity against lift-off are analysed. Historically, the pulsed eddy current method was introduced to improve the performance of eddy current testing both in terms of increased penetration depth and lift-off invariance by exploiting time-domain features analysis, commonly precluded when using single-or multi tone excitations. In this work, such analysis is instead accomplished by using a swept-frequency excitation signal along with an optimized pulse-compression procedure. This approach allows the user to easily tune the energy delivered to the system by increasing the sweep duration to improve on demand the resultant Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) without losing the capability of time-domain feature extraction. The imaging procedure makes use of amplitude and phase features of both frequency-and time-domain data where time-phase is defined through the Hilbert transform of the pulse-compression output. The detection capability of various imaging strategies, namely A-, B- and C-scans, are compared in terms of inspection depth and lift-off robustness by using the SNR merit factor. It is shown that time-domain features outperform frequency-based ones in terms of SNR for the case of deeper defects and that phase features are robust against lift-off variations for both time and frequency domains. In addition, the analysis of time-amplitude images clearly shows the presence of lift-off invariant points. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental evidence of the lift-off invariance points retrieved after applying pulse-compression in combination with coded excitation instead of using directly pulsed, multi-tone or single-tone sinusoidal signals. This not only confirms previous results achieved by the authors but also demonstrates that pulse-compression eddy current can represent a solution to combine the advantages of pulsed and sinusoidal excitation strategies.
机译:本文报告了基于适用于铝合金基准测试样本上收集的涡流数据的时间和频域特征的成像过程之间的比较。分析了缺陷检测能力和抗剥离免疫力。从历史上看,通过利用时域特征分析,引入脉冲涡流方法以提高涡流测试的性能,这两者都是通过利用时域特征分析来提高的渗透深度和剥离不变性,通常排除使用单或多色调激励时。在这项工作中,通过使用扫描频率激励信号以及优化的脉冲压缩过程来实现这种分析。这种方法允许用户通过增加扫描持续时间来容易地调谐到系统的能量,以提高所需的信噪比(SNR)而不损失时域特征提取的能力。成像过程利用频率和时域数据的幅度和相位特征,其中通过脉冲压缩输出的HILBERT变换定义时间阶段。通过使用SNR优点因子,在检查深度和剥离鲁棒性方面进行比较各种成像策略,即A-,B和C扫描的检测能力。结果表明,在更深缺陷的情况下,时域特征在SNR方面优于SNR,并且该相位特征对时间和频率域的升力变化是鲁棒的。另外,时间幅度图像的分析清楚地示出了剥离不变点的存在。据我们所知,这是在与编码激励的组合应用脉冲压缩之后检索的升空不变性点的第一个实验证据,而不是使用直接脉冲,多音或单音正弦信号。这不仅证实了作者实现的先前结果,而且还表明脉冲压缩涡电流可以代表结合脉冲和正弦励磁策略的优点的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号