首页> 外文期刊>Aesthetic plastic surgery >Comparison of the rubin dermal suspension sutures and total parenchymal reshaping technique with a traditional inverted T-scar reduction mammaplasty technique using a superior pedicle
【24h】

Comparison of the rubin dermal suspension sutures and total parenchymal reshaping technique with a traditional inverted T-scar reduction mammaplasty technique using a superior pedicle

机译:鲁宾真皮悬架缝合线和全实质重塑技术与传统的反向T瘢痕复位乳头成形术(使用上等椎弓根)的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adipose patients, especially after massive weight loss, pose a challenge to the breast surgeon due to the major loss of volume and the inelasticity of the skin. Rubin described a suitable mammaplasty technique for these patients involving dermal suspension sutures and total parenchymal reshaping. With this technique, the tissue of the prominent axillary skin fold typically found in patients with massive weight loss is used to increase the upper pole volume of the breast. To prove the effectiveness of this technique, the current study compared it with a traditional inverted T-scar technique using a superior pedicle, as described by H?hler. This technique usually is used for a different patient clientele that requires reduction mammaplasty. However, because none of the difficult aforementioned preconditions are found in this clientele, it leads to the best possible outcome and represents the authors' internal "gold standard" for mammaplasty against which all other techniques must be compared. This study retrospectively analyzed the complication rate, lift effect, and upper pole fullness by chart analysis and photometric analysis of 21 H?hler and 24 Rubin mammaplasties. Despite the more challenging patient clientele in the Rubin groups, both therapies achieved a similar lift effect without significant differences (H?hler 4.8 ± 3.3 cm vs Rubin 6 ± 4 cm). In both groups, the upper pole area increased significantly. The ratio of upper pole-to-lower pole area increased from 1.31 preoperatively to 2.1 postoperatively in the Rubin group, suggesting a redistribution of tissue in favor of the upper pole, and it increased from 1.18 to 1.69 in the H?hler group, indicating an even greater increase in upper pole volume in the Rubin group. In conclusion, the technique described by Rubin, despite the dramatically more difficult soft tissue condition of the patients with massive weight loss, results in an outcome similar to that of a traditional reduction mammaplasty technique in terms of increased upper pole volume. It is suitable and preferable for patients who have a lateral axillary roll deformity and can be applied safely for these patients without increasing the complication rate.
机译:脂肪患者,尤其是大量减肥后,由于体积的大量损失和皮肤的无弹性,给乳腺外科医师带来了挑战。 Rubin为这些患者介绍了一种适合的乳房成形术,涉及皮肤悬架缝合线和实质实质整形。通过这种技术,通常在体重大量减轻的患者中发现明显的腋窝皮肤褶皱组织,以增加乳房的上极容积。为了证明该技术的有效性,当前的研究将其与使用高级椎弓根的传统倒T型瘢痕术进行了比较,如H?hler所述。此技术通常用于需要减少乳房成形术的其他患者客户。但是,由于在此客户群中没有发现上述困难的前提条件,因此它导致了可能的最佳结果,并且代表了作者对于乳房成形术的内部“黄金标准”,必须与所有其他技术进行比较。这项研究通过图表分析和光度分析对21 H?hler和24 Rubin乳房成形术进行了回顾性分析,分析了并发症发生率,提升效果和上极饱满度。尽管鲁宾组的患者客户更具挑战性,但两种疗法均实现了相似的提升效果,但无显着差异(H?hler 4.8±3.3 cm vs Rubin 6±4 cm)。在两组中,上极面积均显着增加。鲁宾组上极与下极面积之比从术前的1.31增加到术后的2.1,表明组织有利于上极的重新分布,而H?hler组则从1.18增加到1.69,表明鲁宾组的上极容积甚至更大。总之,鲁宾描述的技术,尽管体重减轻患者的软组织状况明显困难得多,但在增加上极容积方面,其结果类似于传统的减少乳房成形术。它对于腋窝侧倾畸形的患者是合适的,并且可以在不增加并发症发生率的情况下安全地应用于这些患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号