...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews neuroscience >Structured physiotherapy including a work place intervention for patients with neck and/or back pain in primary care: an economic evaluation
【24h】

Structured physiotherapy including a work place intervention for patients with neck and/or back pain in primary care: an economic evaluation

机译:结构化物理疗法,包括颈部和/或初级保健患者的工作场所干预:经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A cluster-randomized controlled trial, WorkUp, was conducted for working-aged patients at risk of sick leave or on short-term sick leave due to acute/subacute neck and/or back pain in Sweden. The purpose of WorkUp was to facilitate participants to stay at work or in case of sick leave, return-to-work. The aim of this study was to study whether the WorkUp trial was cost-effective. Patients in the intervention and reference group received structured evidence-based physiotherapy, while patients in the intervention group also received a work place dialogue with the employer as an add-on. The participants, 352 in total, were recruited from 20 physiotherapeutic units in primary healthcare in southern Sweden. The economic evaluation was performed both from a healthcare and a societal perspective with a 12-month time frame with extensive univariate sensitivity analyses. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with outcomes measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and proportion working for at least 4 weeks in a row without reported sick leave at 12-month follow-up. From the healthcare perspective, the ICER was (sic)23,606 (2013 price year) per QALY gain. From the societal perspective the intervention was dominating, i.e.. less costly and more effective than reference care. Bootstrap analysis showed that the probability of the intervention to be cost-effective at (sic)50,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY was 85% from the societal perspective. Structured evidence-based physiotherapeutic care together with workplace dialogue is a cost-effective alternative from both a societal and a healthcare perspective for acute/subacute neck and/or back pain patients.
机译:对于瑞典急性/亚急性颈部和/或背部疼痛,对患病休假风险或短期病假进行的群体随机对照试验进行处理。次劳工具的目的是促进参与者留在工作或患病的情况下,回归工作。本研究的目的是研究后工程试验是否具有成本效益。干预和参考组的患者接受了结构性证据的物理治疗,而干预组的患者还收到了与雇主作为附加的工作场所对话。总共352人的参与者在瑞典南部的主要医疗保健中招募了来自20个物理治疗机组。从医疗保健和社会角度进行经济评估,具有12个月的时间范围,具有广泛的单变量敏感性分析。结果呈现为增量成本效益比率(ICER),其结果被测量为质量调整的寿命 - 年(QALY),并且连续工作至少4周工作,未经12个月的随访报告病假。从医疗保健的角度来看,ICER是(SIC)23,606(2013年价格年)每个Qaly获得。从社会角度来看,干预是占主导地位的,即,比参考护理更昂贵和更有效。 Bootstrap分析表明,介入在(SIC)50,000人愿意每QALY愿意支付的概率与社会角度均值为85%。与工作场所对话的结构化的基于证据的物理治疗保健是来自急性/亚急性颈部和/或背部疼痛患者的社会和医疗保健前景的成本效益的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号