...
首页> 外文期刊>Addictive behaviors >Interactions between adaptive coping and drinking to cope in predicting naturalistic drinking and drinking following a lab-based psychosocial stressor
【24h】

Interactions between adaptive coping and drinking to cope in predicting naturalistic drinking and drinking following a lab-based psychosocial stressor

机译:适应性应对与饮酒之间的相互作用,以预测基于实验室的心理社会压力源的自然饮酒和饮酒

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using alcohol to cope (i.e., coping motivation) and general coping style both are theorized and demonstrated empirically to lead to problematic drinking. In the present study, we sought to examine whether these factors interact to predict alcohol use, both retrospectively reported and in the lab following a stressor task. Social drinkers (N = 50, 50% women) received the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), and then consumed beer under the guise of a taste test. A Timeline Followback interview to assess past month alcohol use, the Drinking Motives Questionnaire (DMQ), and the COPE (to assess adaptive coping) were administered prior to the laboratory challenge. Multiple regression models were used to examine DMQ coping motives, adaptive coping, and their interaction as predictors of milliliters (mls) of beer consumed in a clinical laboratory setting. The association between coping motives and mls beer was positive at both high and low levels of adaptive coping, but at low levels of adaptive coping, this association was stronger. In contrast, there was no interaction between adaptive coping and coping motives in predicting quantity and frequency of drinking in the prior month. Findings suggest that stronger coping motives for drinking predict greater alcohol consumption following a stress provocation to a greater extent when an individual is lacking in adaptive coping strategies. As both general coping skills and coping motives for alcohol use are responsive to intervention, study of the conditions under which they exert unique and interactive effects is important. ? 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
机译:理论上并使用酒精来应对(即应对动机)和一般应对方式均会导致饮酒问题。在本研究中,我们试图检查这些因素是否相互影响以预测饮酒,无论是回顾性报道还是在实验室进行应激实验后。社交饮酒者(N = 50,女性占50%)接受了Trier社会压力测试(TSST),然后以味觉测试为幌子消费了啤酒。在进行实验室挑战之前,先进行了时间轴跟踪访谈以评估过去一个月的饮酒情况,饮酒动机问卷(DMQ)和COPE(以评估适应性应对)。多元回归模型用于检查DMQ应对动机,适应性应对及其相互作用,以作为临床实验室环境中所消耗啤酒的毫升(ml)的预测指标。在高和低水平的适应性应对中,应对动机与mls啤酒之间的关联为正,但是在低水平的适应性应对中,这种联系更强。相反,在预测上个月的饮酒量和饮酒频率时,适应性应对和应对动机之间没有相互作用。研究结果表明,当一个人缺乏适应性应对策略时,较强的应对动机会在更大的压力激发下预测更大的饮酒量。由于一般的应对技巧和饮酒的应对动机都对干预有反应,因此研究在其下发挥独特和互动作用的条件非常重要。 ? 2012爱思唯尔有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号