...
首页> 外文期刊>Addiction >Clinical provision of improvised nasal naloxone without experimental testing and without regulatory approval: imaginative shortcut or dangerous bypass of essential safety procedures?
【24h】

Clinical provision of improvised nasal naloxone without experimental testing and without regulatory approval: imaginative shortcut or dangerous bypass of essential safety procedures?

机译:未经实验测试且未经监管部门批准的简易鼻纳洛酮的临床提供:想象中的捷径或基本安全程序的危险旁路?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ContextTake-home naloxone is increasingly provided to prevent heroin overdose deaths. Naloxone 0.4-2.0mg is licensed for use by injection. Some clinicians supply improvised nasal naloxone kits (outside lisenced approval). Is this acceptable?Aims(1) To consider provision of improvised nasal naloxone in clinical practice and (2) to search for evidence for pharmacokinetics and effectiveness (versus injection). Methods(1) To document existing nasal naloxone schemes and published evidence of pharmacokinetics (systematic search of the CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases and 18 records included in narrative synthesis). (2) To analyse ongoing studies investigating nasal naloxone (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and US NIH RePORT databases). Findings(1) Multiple studies report overdose reversals following administration of improvised intranasal naloxone. (2) Overdose reversal after nasal naloxone is frequent but may not always occur. (3) Until late 2015, the only commercially available naloxone concentrations were 0.4mg/ml and 2mg/2ml. Nasal medications are typically 0.05-0.25ml of fluid per nostril. The only published study of pharmacokinetics and bioavailability finds that nasal naloxone has poor bioavailability. Questions for debate(1) Why are pharmacokinetics and bioavailability data for nasal naloxone not available before incorporation into standard clinical practice? (2) Does nasal naloxone have the potential to become a reliable clinical formulation? (3) What pre-clinical and clinical studies should precede utilization of novel naloxone formulations as standard emergency medications? ConclusionsThe addictions treatment field has rushed prematurely into the use of improvised nasal naloxone kits. Evidence of adequate bioavailability and acceptable pharmacokinetic curves are vital preliminary steps, especially when effective approved formulations exist.
机译:背景越来越多地提供外带纳洛酮来预防海洛因过量死亡。纳洛酮0.4-2.0mg已获许可注射使用。一些临床医生提供简易的纳洛酮鼻药盒(未经许可的使用)。目的(1)在临床实践中考虑提供即兴的鼻纳洛酮;(2)寻找药代动力学和有效性的证据(与注射相比)。方法(1)记录现有的鼻纳洛酮方案并发表药代动力学证据(系统搜索CINAHL,Cochrane,EMBASE和MEDLINE数据库,并在叙述性合成中包括18条记录)。 (2)分析正在进行的研究鼻纳洛酮的研究(世卫组织国际临床试验注册平台和美国国立卫生研究院报告数据库)。研究发现(1)多项研究报告,服用简易鼻内纳洛酮后出现药物过量逆转。 (2)鼻纳洛酮后的药物过量逆转是经常发生的,但可能并非总是如此。 (3)直到2015年年底,纳洛酮的市售浓度仅为0.4mg / ml和2mg / 2ml。鼻部药物通常每个鼻孔含0.05-0.25ml液体。唯一发表的药代动力学和生物利用度研究发现,鼻纳洛酮的生物利用度较差。有待讨论的问题(1)为什么在纳入标准临床实践之前无法获得鼻纳洛酮的药代动力学和生物利用度数据? (2)鼻纳洛酮是否有可能成为可靠​​的临床制剂? (3)在使用新型纳洛酮制剂作为标准急诊药物之前,应进行哪些临床前和临床研究?结论成瘾治疗领域已经过时地进入了简易的纳洛酮鼻药盒的使用。足够的生物利用度和可接受的药代动力学曲线的证据是至关重要的初步步骤,尤其是当存在有效的批准制剂时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号