首页> 外文期刊>Mutation Research. Reviews in Mutation Research >Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. XVII. Formation mechanisms underlying naturally occurring DNA deletions in the human genome and their potential relevance for bridging the gap between induced DNA double-strand breaks and deletions in irradiated germ cells
【24h】

Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. XVII. Formation mechanisms underlying naturally occurring DNA deletions in the human genome and their potential relevance for bridging the gap between induced DNA double-strand breaks and deletions in irradiated germ cells

机译:电离辐射和遗传风险。 十八。 在人类基因组中自然发生的DNA缺失的形成机制及其对桥接诱导的DNA双链断裂和辐射生殖细胞缺失之间的差异的潜在相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While much is known about radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and their repair, the question of how deletions of different sizes arise as a result of the processing of DSBs by the cell's repair systems has not been fully answered. In order to bridge this gap between DSBs and deletions, we critically reviewed published data on mechanisms pertaining to: (a) repair of DNA DSBs (from basic studies in this area); (b) formation of naturally occurring structural variation (SV) - especially of deletions - in the human genome (from genomic studies) and (c) radiation-induced mutations and structural chromosomal aberrations in mammalian somatic cells (from radiation mutagenesis and radiation cytogenetic studies). The specific aim was to assess the relative importance of the postulated mechanisms in generating deletions in the human genome and examine whether empirical data on radiation-induced deletions in mouse germ cells are consistent with predictions of these mechanisms. The mechanisms include (a) NHEJ, a DSB repair process that does not require any homology and which functions in all stages of the cell cycle (and is of particular relevance in G0/G1); (b) MMEJ, also a DSB repair process but which requires microhomology and which presumably functions in all cell cycle stages; (c) NAHR, a recombination-based DSB repair mechanism which operates in prophase I of meiosis in germ cells; (d) MMBIR, a microhomology-mediated, replication-based mechanism which operates in the S phase of the cell cycle, and (e) strand slippage during replication (involved in the origin of small insertions and deletions (INDELs).Our analysis permits the inference that, between them, these five mechanisms can explain nearly all naturally occurring deletions of different sizes identified in the human genome, NAHR and MMBIR being potentially more versatile in this regard. With respect to radiation-induced deletions, the basic studies suggest that those arising as a result of the operation of NHEJ/MMEJ processes, as currently formulated, are expected to be relatively small. However, data on induced mutations in mouse spermatogonial stem cells (irradiation in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and DSB repair presumed to be via NHEJ predominantly) show that most are associated with deletions of different sizes, some in the megabase range. There is thus a 'discrepancy' between what the basic studies suggest and the empirical observations in mutagenesis studies. This discrepancy, however, is only an apparent but not a real one. It can be resolved by considering the issue of deletions in the broader context of and in conjunction with the organization of chromatin in chromosomes and nuclear architecture, the conceptual framework for which already exists in studies carried out during the past fifteen years or so. In this paper, we specifically hypothesize that repair of DSBs induced in chromatin loops may offer a basis to explain the induction of deletions of different sizes and suggest an approach to test the hypothesis. We emphasize that the bridging of the gap between induced DSB and resulting deletions of different sizes is critical for current efforts in computational modeling of genetic risks.
机译:虽然关于辐射诱导的DNA双链休息(DSB)的许多人以及其修复,但由于细胞的修复系统的DSB的处理而出现不同尺寸的删除问题尚未完全回答。为了弥合DSB和缺失之间的这种差距,我们批评了已发布的数据有关关于的机制:(a)DNA DSB的修复(来自该领域的基础研究); (b)形成天然存在的结构变异(SV) - 特别是缺失 - 在人类基因组(来自基因组研究)和(c)哺乳动物体细胞中的辐射诱导的突变和结构染色体畸变(来自辐射诱变和辐射细胞遗传学研究)。具体目标是评估假设机制在人类基因组中产生缺失的相对重要性,并检查小鼠胚细胞中辐射诱导的缺失的经验数据是否与这些机制的预测一致。该机制包括(a)NHEJ,一种不需要任何同源性的DSB修复过程,并且在细胞周期的所有阶段(并且在G0 / G1中特别相关); (b)MMEJ,也是一种DSB修复过程,但需要微观学,并且可能在所有细胞周期阶段中的功能; (c)NaHR,一种基于重组的DSB修复机制,其在生殖细胞中的PERHASE I中操作; (d)MMBIR,微疗效介导的,基于复制的机制,其在细胞周期的S相中运行,并在复制期间(e)链滑动(参与小插入和缺失(indels).ous分析许可在它们之间的推测,这五种机制可以解释在人类基因组中鉴定的不同尺寸的几乎所有天然存在的缺失,在这方面都可能更通用。关于辐射诱导的缺失,基本研究表明由于当前配制的NHEJ / MMEJ方法的操作而产生的那些是相对较小的。然而,关于小鼠精子干细胞诱导突变的数据(细胞周期和DSB修复的G0 / G1相的辐射推测是通过NHEJ主要的)显示,大多数与不同尺寸的删除相关,其中一些在兆塔范围内。因此,基本研究苏之间存在“差异”诱变研究中的效果和经验观察。然而,这种差异只是一个明显但不是真实的。可以通过考虑更广泛的背景下的缺失问题和与染色体组织在染色体和核建筑中的组织中,在过去的十五年左右进行的研究中进行的概念框架中的缺失问题来解决。在本文中,我们特别假设染色质环诱导的DSB的修复可以为解释不同尺寸的缺失并表明一种测试假设的方法来提供基础。我们强调,诱导DSB之间的差距和不同尺寸的缺失对于当前遗传风险计算建模的努力至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号