首页> 外文期刊>Measurement Science & Technology >Galileo-based precise point positioning with different MGEX products
【24h】

Galileo-based precise point positioning with different MGEX products

机译:基于伽利略的精确点定位,具有不同的MGEx产品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Considering the remarkable progress of the Galileo constellation in recent years, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of dual- and single-frequency Galileo-based precise point positioning (PPP), and its contribution to GPS and Galileo integration with different precise products generated by four analysis centers (ACs) within the context of the Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS). For this purpose, the daily observation dataset collected at ten IGS stations over one month was processed in both static and kinematic modes for Galileo-only, GPS-only, and GPS/Galileo PPP scenarios. For dual-frequency PPP, the results demonstrate that while the Galileo-only solutions are highly comparable with GPS-only PPP for the static mode, the mean 3D positioning errors for Galileo-only processes are approximately 1-cm higher than those obtained from GPS-only solutions for all agencies. The analysis to evaluate the influence of Galileo satellites with highly eccentric orbits, namely E14 and E18, on dual-frequency Galileo-only PPP performance indicates that including or excluding these satellites has no significant effect on the results. For single-frequency PPP, which is dependent on the GRAPHIC combination, Galileo-only PPP performs significantly better, approximately 40%, than GPS-only solutions in the static mode, whereas kinematic Galileo-only and GPS-only PPP solutions are quite similar for all agencies except for WHU. In addition, the RMS of observation residuals for Galileo in single-frequency PPP was noticeably lower than that for GPS, demonstrating that the observation quality of Galileo code measurements is better than those of GPS. Among the ACs, Galileo-based PPP solutions applying CODE products produced slightly better results than those obtained for GFZ and CNES/CLS in general, whereas processes using WHU products resulted in a worse performance, both in terms of positioning accuracy and of convergence time. The integration of Galileo with GPS was shown to enhance PPP performance significantly in both static and kinematic modes.
机译:考虑到近年来伽利略星座的显着进展,本研究的主要目标是评估双频和单频伽利略的精确点定位(PPP)的性能,以及它对与不同的GPS和伽利略集成的贡献在国际GNSS服务(IGS)的多GNSS实验(MGEX)的背景下,四个分析中心(ACS)产生的精确产品。为此目的,在一个月内收集的日常观测数据集在一个月内收集的,仅在伽利略,仅GPS和GPS / Galileo PPP方案的静态和运动模式下处理。对于双频PPP,结果表明,虽然伽利略解决方案与静态模式的GPS--PPP相比高度相当,但伽梭胶的平均3D定位误差比从GPS获得的高度高约1cm - 为所有机构的解决方案。评估伽利略卫星与高偏心轨道的影响,即E14和E18,仅在双频伽利略的PPP性能上表明包括或不包括这些卫星对结果没有显着影响。对于单频PPP,它取决于图形组合,伽利略PPP在静态模式下执行显着更好,大约40%,而不是GPS的静态解决方案,而运动伽利略伽利略伽利略术和GPS的PPP解决方案非常相似对于除了WHU之外的所有机构。此外,单频PPP中伽利略的观察残留的RMS明显低于GPS,表明伽利略代码测量的观察质量优于GPS。在ACS中,基于伽利略的PPP解决方案应用代码产品的效果略微产生,而不是GFZ和CNE / CLS的结果,而使用WHU产品的过程导致了较差的性能,无论是定位精度和收敛时间。伽利略与GPS的整合显示,在静态和运动模式中显着提高PPP性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号