首页> 外文期刊>International journal of urological nursing: the journal of the BAUN >Managing difficult catheterisation in nurse‐led catheterisation services: Does guidewire‐assisted urethral catheterisation make a difference?
【24h】

Managing difficult catheterisation in nurse‐led catheterisation services: Does guidewire‐assisted urethral catheterisation make a difference?

机译:在护士LED导管型服务中管理难以导热率:导游辅助尿道导管会产生差异吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract The use of guidewires is well established in medical practice, but relatively new in nurse‐led catheterisation services (NCS). We investigate the incidence of difficult urethral catheterisation and whether guidewire‐assisted catheterisation reduces disrupted patient care. A retrospective Audit (September 2016‐August 2017) recorded incidence and management of difficult catheterisation in two NCS. In NCS‐A, nurses were familiar with improvised guidewire‐assisted catheterisation, whereas in NCS‐B nurses were not enabled and had to refer patients to urologists when they encountered problems. From September 2017 to August 2018, a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)‐approved urethral catheterisation device with integrated guidewire (Urethrotech UCD) was used in NCS‐B for difficult urethral catheterisation. User and patient satisfaction was evaluated prospectively. Of 540 men attending NCS‐A for trial without catheter (TWOC), 31% (169/540) were recatheterized, of whom 4%(6/169) required a guidewire‐catheterisation technique to manage difficult catheterisation without problems. This was also done in 45 of 146 men attending for long‐term catheter change with known history of difficult catheter change. Of 1002 men attending NCS‐B for TWOC, 23% (226/1002) were recatheterized. This was difficult in 25% (57/226), of which 40% (23/57) suffered complications with bleeding from repeated catheterisation attempts and 10 men had to be admitted for specialist interventions to manage retention and catheterisation‐associated urethral injury. During the prospective audit, 945 men attended the TWOC‐clinic of NCS‐B. In 11% (13/120), the UCD was used for failed Foley‐catheterisation without complications. Patients and users were very satisfied because the difficult recatheterisation episode was managed successfully without patient harm and care delay. Difficult urethral catheterisation is a frequent occurrence in NCS with significant risk of urethral trauma. Catheterisation‐associated urethral injury can be prevented with guidewire‐assisted urethral catheterisation techniques. The NICE‐approved UCD with integrated guidewire was easy to use with high user and patient satisfaction avoiding patient care delay and is supporting nurses to manage difficult urethral catheterisation safely making efficient use of specialist resources.
机译:摘要使用导丝的使用是在医疗实践中建立的,但在护士LED导管服务(NCS)中相对较新。我们研究了难以尿道导管的发生率,以及导丝辅助导管术是否减少了患者护理中断。回顾性审计(2017年9月 - 2017年8月)在两届NCS中记录了难导体化的发病率和管理。在NCS-A中,护士熟悉简易导出的导管辅助导管,而在NCS-B护士中未被启用,并且在遇到问题时不得不将患者提交给泌尿科医生。从2017年9月到2018年8月,国家健康和护理研究所(漂亮的)批评尿道导管仪(URETHROTECH UCD)用于NCS-B,用于难以尿道导管。预期评估用户和患者满意度。在没有导管(TWOC)的540名参加NCS-A的男性,31%(169/540)被修复,其中4%(6/169)需要导管导管型技术,用于在没有问题的情况下管理困难的导热态化。这也是在146名男子中的45名参加了长期导管变化的45个,具有困难的导管变化的已知历史。 1002人参加TWOC的NCS-B,23%(226/1002)进行了压力资金。这难以在25%(57/226)中难以,其中40%(23/57)患有反复导管尝试出血的并发症,并且必须为专业干预措施录取10名男子来管理保留和导管相关的尿道伤害。在预期审计期间,945名男子参加了NCS-B的TWOC诊所。在11%(13/120)中,UCD用于失败的Foley导热术而无需并发症。患者和用户非常满意,因为在没有患者伤害和护理延迟的情况下成功管理困难的述干肿声插曲。困难的尿道导管术是NCS频繁发生,具有尿道创伤风险显着。导管相关的尿道损伤可以用导丝辅助尿道导管型技术防止。具有综合导游的良好批准的UCD易于使用高用户和患者满意度避免患者护理延迟,并支持护士,以便安全地利用专业资源管理困难的尿道导管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号