首页> 外文期刊>Microsurgery. >Comparison between donor nerves to motorize the free functional gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion: Retrospective study of 38 consecutive cases in traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries
【24h】

Comparison between donor nerves to motorize the free functional gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion: Retrospective study of 38 consecutive cases in traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries

机译:供体神经的比较,使肘部屈曲的自由官能团肌肉转移:创伤性成人臂丛丛中38例连续38例回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose Elbow flexion deficit is a frequent problem in traumatic brachial plexus injuries and reestablishment of this function is the primary treatment goal. When management is delayed, or the initial acute approach fails, free functional transfer of the gracilis muscle for elbow flexion is the treatment of choice. In this report, the authors present the results of a comparison study on different donor nerves (spinal accessory and ulnar) in elbow flexion reconstruction with gracilis flap for traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with both total or partial traumatic brachial plexus injuries was carried out. Of the 38 patients enrolled, 37 were male (97.4%) with a mean age of 28.3 years. The mean follow‐up period was 25?months. Postoperative function of the gracilis muscle flap was recorded and patients were divided into two groups according to donor nerve: spinal accessory nerve (SAN) (18 cases), and motor fascicles of the ulnar (ULNAR) (20 cases). Results Twenty‐six cases obtained elbow flexion strength M3 or M4 (68.4%): 0?M0 (0.0%), 4?M1 (10.5%), 8?M2 (21.1%), 9?M3 (23.7%) and 17?M4 (44.7%). The mean interval to first recorded M3 muscular strength was 12.4?months. Functional elbow flexion strength (≥ M3) had the following distribution: SAN 83.3% (15/18) and ULNAR 55.0% (11/20) ( p =?.086). Conclusion No statistical difference for final muscle strength was found between donor nerve groups.
机译:目的肘部屈曲赤字是创伤性臂丛丛中的常见问题,并且这种功能的重建是主要的治疗目标。当管理延迟时,或初始急性方法发生故障,Gracilis肌肉的免费功能转移为肘部屈曲是选择的选择。在本报告中,作者呈现了对肘部屈曲重建的不同供体神经(脊柱辅助和尺骨)的比较研究结果,用于创伤性成人臂丛丛伤。方法进行全部或部分创伤臂丛患者的回顾性分析。在注册的38名患者中,37名是男性(97.4%),平均年龄为28.3岁。平均随访时间为25?几个月。记录了Gracilis肌皮瓣的术后功能,并根据供体神经的患者分为两组:脊柱辅助神经(SAN)(18例)和尺骨(ULNAR)的电机束(20例)。结果26例获得弯头屈曲强度M3或M4(68.4%):0≤M0(0.0%),4〜M1(10.5%),8?M2(21.1%),9?M3(23.7%)和17 ?M4(44.7%)。第一次记录M3肌肉强度的平均间隔为12.4个月。功能性弯头屈曲强度(≥M3)具有以下分布:SAN 83.3%(15/18)和ULNAR 55.0%(11/20)(P = 086)。结论供体神经组之间发现了最终肌肉力量的统计学差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Microsurgery.》 |2019年第5期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Hand and Microsurgery Unit Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryS?o Paulo UniversityS?o Paulo Brazil;

    Hand and Microsurgery Unit Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryS?o Paulo UniversityS?o Paulo Brazil;

    Hand and Microsurgery Unit Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryS?o Paulo UniversityS?o Paulo Brazil;

    Hand and Microsurgery Unit Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryS?o Paulo UniversityS?o Paulo Brazil;

    Hand and Microsurgery Unit Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryS?o Paulo UniversityS?o Paulo Brazil;

    Hand and Microsurgery Unit Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryS?o Paulo UniversityS?o Paulo Brazil;

    Hand and Microsurgery Unit Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryS?o Paulo UniversityS?o Paulo Brazil;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 特种外科手术学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号