首页> 外文期刊>Microchemical Journal: Devoted to the Application of Microtechniques in all Branches of Science >Effect of signal acquisition mode on isotope ratio precision and accuracy in ICP-quadrupole-MS analysis
【24h】

Effect of signal acquisition mode on isotope ratio precision and accuracy in ICP-quadrupole-MS analysis

机译:信号采集模式对ICP-Quadrupole-MS分析中同位素比精度和精度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Isotope ratios (IRs) precision obtained on ICP-quadrupole MS (ICP-QMS) with ion counting detector (IC) is worse than that of TIMS or MC-ICP-MS with multiple faraday-cup detectors. To collect low and high ion signal (10(0)-10(9)), the IC detector operated in pulse (P), analog (A) or dual (D) acquisition mode has become widespread used in most commercial ICP-QMS instruments since 1990s. However, the analysis performance of IRs measurement by different signal acquisition modes (P, A, or D) were scarcely studied. The precision and accuracy of IRs (i.e., B-11(/10),Cd-114/110, and (208/206)pb) obtained in three modes was systematically evaluated in this paper. The internal precision (RSD) of IRs obtained in P mode gradually improved with the increasing of ion counting intensities, which was consistent with the principal of the counting statistical error (SE). However, it suddenly deteriorated on D (0.16-0.24% for B-11(/10), 0.17-0.22% for Cd-114(/110), and 0.16-0.22% for Pb-208/206) or A mode (0.13 to 0.10% for (11)(/)(10)(B), from 0.16 to 0.12% for(114/110)Cd and from 0.16 to 0.14% for (208/206)pb) with a further increase in ion counting. Meanwhile, both accuracy (relative error, RE, %) and external precision (RESD, %) of IRs were better in P mode rather than that of D and A mode. The instability of the A-P correlation (the correlation between pulse and analog signal outputs) was observed by monitoring the variation of signal tuning factor (T-f, which applied to convert the analog to pulse signal outputs). When the T-f was employed as a constant by the instrumental operating software rather than a dynamic correction value, a random error was occurred. This constant T-f value was the main source of the poor precision and accuracy for IRs measurement with A or D mode. Therefore, operating in P acquisition mode with a signal intensity range (0.7-0.9 M CPS for B-11(,) 1.0-1.2 M CPS for Cd-114 and Pb-208) was recommended to obtain the best IRs performance in ICP-QMS analysis.
机译:在具有离子计数检测器(IC)的ICP-Quadrupole MS(ICP-QMS)上获得的同位素比(ICP-QMS)比具有多个法拉第杯探测器的TIMS或MC-ICP-MS的ICP-Quadrupole MS(ICP-QMS)精度。收集低离子信号(10(0)-10(9)),以脉冲(P),模拟(A)或双(D)采集模式运行的IC检测器已在大多数商业ICP-QMS中普遍存在自20世纪90年代以来的仪器。然而,几乎已经研究了不同信号采集模式(P,A或D)的IRS测量的分析性能。本文系统地评估了三种模式中获得的IRS(即,B-11(/ 10),CD-114/110和(208/206)Pb)的精度和精度。在P模式下获得的IRS的内部精度(RSD)随着离子计数强度的增加而逐渐提高,这与计数统计误差(SE)的原理一致。然而,它突然在d(B-11(/ 10)的0.16-0.24%的0.16-0.24%,CD-114(/ 110)的0.17-0.22%,Pb-208/206的0.16-0.22%)或模式( (11)(/)(10)(b)的0.13至0.10%,(114/110)Cd的0.16至0.12%,含有0.16至0.14%的0.16至0.14%),进一步增加离子数数。同时,在P模式而不是D和模式的P模式下,IRS的精度(相对误差,RE,%)和外部精度(RESD,%)均更好。通过监测信号调谐因子(T-F的变化来观察A-P相关性的不稳定性(脉冲和模拟信号输出之间的相关性)通过施加的信号调谐因子(施加以转换模拟与脉冲信号输出)。当通过仪器操作软件而不是动态校正值使用T-F作为常数时,发生了随机误差。这种恒定的T-F值是使用A或D模式的IRS测量的精度和精度差的主要来源。因此,建议使用信号强度范围的P获取模式(B-11(,)1.0-1.2 M CPS用于CD-114和PB-208的0.7-0.9 m CP),以获得ICP中的最佳IRS性能。 QMS分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号