首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The Relationship Between Educational Years and Phonemic Verbal Fluency (PVF) and Semantic Verbal Fluency (SVF) Tasks in Spanish Patients Diagnosed With Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Psychotic Bipolar Disorder
【24h】

The Relationship Between Educational Years and Phonemic Verbal Fluency (PVF) and Semantic Verbal Fluency (SVF) Tasks in Spanish Patients Diagnosed With Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Psychotic Bipolar Disorder

机译:西班牙语患者诊断性精神分裂症,双相障碍和精神障碍双相障碍的西班牙语患者中教育年龄和语音口语流畅性(PVF)和语义口头流畅性(SVF)的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Semantic and verbal fluency tasks are widely used as a measure of frontal capacities. It has been well described in literature that patients affected by schizophrenic and bipolar disorders present a worse execution in these tasks. Some authors have also noted the importance of educational years. Our objective is to analyze whether the effect of cognitive malfunction caused by apathology is superior to the expected effect of years of education in phonemic verbal fluency (PVF) and semantic verbal fluency (SVF) task execution.A total of 62 individuals took part in this study, out of which 23 were patients with schizophrenic paranoid disorder, 11 suffered from bipolar disorder with psychotic symptomatology, 13 suffered from bipolar disorder without psychotic symptomatology, and 15 participants were nonpathological individuals. All participants were evaluated with the PVF and SVF tests (animals and tools). The performance/execution results were analyzed with a mixed-model ANCOVA, with educational years as a covariable.The effect of education seems to be more determined by PVF FAS tests than by SVF. With PVF FAS tasks, the expected effect of pathology disappears when the covariable EDUCATION is introduced. With SVF tasks, the effect continues to be significant, even though the EDUACTION covariable dims such effect.These results suggest that SVF tests (animals category) are better evaluation tools as they are less dependent on the patients' education than PVF FAS tests.
机译:语义和口头流畅性任务被广泛用作额度容量的衡量标准。在由精神分裂症和双相障碍影响的患者对这些任务中的患者进行了很好的描述。一些作者还指出了教育年度的重要性。我们的目的是分析治疗学造成的认知故障的影响是否优于口语口语流畅性(PVF)的预期效果(PVF)和语义口头流畅(SVF)任务执行。总共62人参加了这一点研究,其中23例是精神分裂症偏执疾病的患者,11例患有双相情感障碍的心理症状学,13例患有双相障碍,没有精神病症状,15名参与者是不行的个体。所有参与者都被PVF和SVF测试(动物和工具)评估。使用混合模型Ancova分析了性能/执行结果,教育年份作为可变性。教育的效果似乎更加由PVF FAS测试决定而不是SVF。通过PVF FAS任务,在引入可协议的教育时,病理学的预期效果消失。通过SVF任务,效果仍然存在显着,即使编辑的协调性调整效果也是如此。这结果表明SVF测试(动物类别)是更好的评估工具,因为它们依赖于患者的教育而不是PVF FAS测试。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Medicine.》 |2015年第39期|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Complutense Fac Psychol Basic Psychol Dept 2 Campus Somosaguas Madrid 28223 Spain;

    Univ Complutense Madrid Lab Cognit &

    Computat Neurosci Ctr Biomed Technol CTB Madrid Spain;

    Technol Univ Madrid UPM Madrid Spain;

    Univ Complutense Dept Methodol Behav Sci Fac Psychol Madrid 28223 Spain;

    Technol Univ Madrid UPM Madrid Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 03:55:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号