首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Perseverance, faith and stoicism: a qualitative study of medical student perspectives on managing fatigue
【24h】

Perseverance, faith and stoicism: a qualitative study of medical student perspectives on managing fatigue

机译:坚持不懈,信仰和主题:对医学学生对劳动力的思考的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context Fatigue risk management (FRM) strategies offer a potential solution to the widespread problem of fatigued trainees in the clinical workplace. These strategies assume a shared perception that fatigue is hazardous. Despite the growing body of evidence suggesting that fatigue leads to burnout and medical errors, previous research suggests that residents perceive fatigue as a personal, surmountable burden rather than an occupational hazard. Before we can implement FRM, we need a better understanding of when and how such problematic notions of fatigue are adopted by medical trainees. Thus, we sought to explore how third-year medical students understand and manage the workplace fatigue they experience during their first year of clinical rotations. Methods A total of 22 third-year medical students participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their perspectives of workplace fatigue. Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively in keeping with constructivist grounded theory methodology and were informed by theoretical sampling to sufficiency. Results Our participants described unprecedented levels of sleep deprivation combined with uncertainty and confusion that led to significant fatigue during training. Drawing on their workplace experience, trainees believed that fatigue posed three distinct threats, which evoked different coping strategies: (i) threat to personal health, managed by perseverance; (ii) threat to patients, managed by faith in the system, and (iii) threat to professional reputation, managed by stoicism. Conclusions Our findings highlight how senior medical students grapple with fatigue, as they understand it, within a training context in which they are expected to deny the impact of their fatigue on patients and themselves. Despite empirical evidence to the contrary, the prevailing assumption amongst our participants is that an ability to withstand sleep deprivation without impairment will develop naturally over time. Efforts to implement FRM strategies will need to address this assumption if these strategies are to be successfully taken up and effective.
机译:背景疲劳风险管理(FRM)策略为临床工作场所疲劳的学员的广泛问题提供了潜在的解决方案。这些策略假设疲劳是危险的共同看法。尽管越来越多的证据表明,疲劳导致倦怠和医疗错误,但之前的研究表明,居民认为疲劳是个人,无法克服的负担而不是职业危害。在我们能够实施FRM之前,我们需要更好地了解医疗学员的何时以及如何以及如何以及如何疲劳的概念。因此,我们试图探索第三年的医学生如何理解和管理他们在第一年临床轮换期间经历的工作场所疲劳。方法共有22名第三年的医学生参加了半结构性访谈,探索了工作场所疲劳的观点。数据收集和分析迭代地与建构主义接地理论方法保持一致,并通过理论上采样通知到充足。结果我们的参与者描述了前所未有的睡眠剥夺水平,结合不确定性和困惑,导致训练期间的疲劳。借鉴他们的工作场所经验,学员认为疲劳构成了三种不同的威胁,这引起了不同的应对策略:(i)通过坚持不懈管理的个人健康威胁; (ii)对患者的威胁,通过对系统的信心管理,(iii)由Sticiscism管理的专业声誉威胁。结论我们的调查结果强调了高级医学生如何用疲劳,因为他们理解它,在培训背景下,他们预计他们预计否认他们对患者和自己的疲劳的影响。尽管有实证证据相反,我们的参与者之间的普遍假设是抵御睡眠剥夺而不损害的能力将随着时间的推移自然地发展。实施FRM战略的努力如果要成功地占用和有效,则需要解决这一假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号