...
【24h】

Hemodynamic effects of support modes of LVADs on the aortic valve

机译:主动脉瓣膜中LVADS载体的血流动力学效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the alternative treatment for heart failure, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been widely applied to clinical practice. However, the effects of the support modes of LVADs on the biomechanical states of the aortic valve are still poorly understood. Hence, the present study investigates such effects and proposes a novel fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach that combines the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) and finite element (FE) method. Two support modes of LVADs, namely constant speed mode and constant flow mode, which have been widely applied to clinical practice, are also designed. Results demonstrate that the support modes of LVADs could significantly affect the biomechanical states of the aortic valve and the blood flow pattern of the ascending aorta. Compared with those in the constant flow mode, the leaflets in the constant speed mode could achieve better dynamic performance and lower stress during the systolic phase. The max radial displacement of the leaflets in the constant speed mode is at 8 mm, whereas that in the constant flow mode is at 0.8 mm. Furthermore, the outflow of LVADs directly impacts the aortic surfaces of the leaflets during the diastolic phase by increasing the level of wall shear stress of the leaflets. The leaflets in the constant speed mode receive less impact than those in the constant flow mode. The condition with such minimal impact is conducive to maintaining the normal structure of leaflets and benefits the reduction of the risk of valvular diseases. In sum, the support modes of LVADs exert a crucial effect on the biomechanical environment of the aortic valve. The constant speed mode is better than the constant flow mode in terms of providing a good hemodynamic environment for the aortic valve.
机译:作为心力衰竭的替代治疗,左心室辅助装置(LVADS)已被广泛应用于临床实践。然而,LVAD的支持模式对主动脉瓣的生物力学状态的影响仍然很差。因此,本研究调查了这些效果,并提出了一种新的流体结构相互作用(FSI)方法,该方法结合了格子玻璃晶板(LATICE)和有限元(Fe)方法。还设计了两种支持模式,即已被广泛应用于临床实践的恒定速度模式和恒定流动模式。结果表明,LVAD的支撑模式可能会显着影响主动脉瓣的生物力学状态和升序主动脉的血流模式。与恒定流动模式中的那些相比,恒定速度模式中的传单可以在收缩阶段期间实现更好的动态性能和更低的应力。恒定速度模式中的传单的最大径向位移为8mm,而在恒定流动模式下为0.8mm。此外,通过增加传单的壁剪切应力的水平,LVAD的流出直接影响舒张相期间的小叶的主动脉表面。恒定速度模式中的传单比恒定流模式中的较少的冲击机器接收。具有这种最小影响的条件有利于保持传单的正常结构,并有益于降低瓣膜疾病的风险。总而言之,LVAD的支持模式对主动脉瓣的生物力学环境产生了关键影响。在为主动脉瓣提供良好的血液动力学环境方面,恒定速度模式优于恒定流动模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号