首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Exploring the Benefits of Transformations in Health Utility Mapping
【24h】

Exploring the Benefits of Transformations in Health Utility Mapping

机译:探索卫生效用映射转型的好处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background. Quality-of-life research and cost-effectiveness analyses frequently require data on health utility, a global measure of health-related quality of life. When utilities are unavailable, researchers have "mapped" descriptive instruments to utility instruments, using samples of responses to both instruments. Health utilities have an idiosyncratic distribution, with upper bound and probability mass at 1, left skewness, and kurtosis. Estimation of mean utility values conditional on covariates is of interest, particularly in health utility mapping applications. Traditional linear regression may be unsuitable because fundamental assumptions are violated. Complex statistical methods come with deficiencies that may outweigh their benefits. Aim. To investigate the benefits of transforming the health utility response variable before fitting a linear regression model. Methods. We compared log, logit, arcsin, and Box-Cox transformations with an untransformed model, using several measures of model accuracy. We made our evaluation by designing and conducting a simulation study and reanalyzing data from 2 published studies, which "mapped" a psychometric descriptive instrument to a utility instrument. Results. In the simulation study, log transformation with smearing estimator had in most cases the lowest bias but one of the highest variances, especially for estimating low utility values under small sample size. The untransformed model was outperformed by the transformed models. Findings were inconclusive for the analysis of real data, where arcsin gave the lowest error for one of the data sets, while the untransformed model had the best performance for the other. Conclusions. We identified the benefits of transformations and offered suggestions for future modeling of health utilities. However, the benefits were moderate and no single transformation appeared to be universally optimal, suggesting that selection requires examination on a case-by-case basis.
机译:背景。生活质量研究和成本效益分析经常需要有关卫生效用的数据,全球衡量健康状况的生活质量。当实用程序不可用时,研究人员将“映射”描述性仪器到公用事业仪器,使用对两种仪器的响应样本。健康用途具有特殊的分布,具有1,左侧偏振和峰度的上限和概率质量。估计协变量的平均实用价值是有意义的,特别是在健康实用程序映射应用中。传统的线性回归可能是不合适的,因为违反了根本假设。复杂的统计方法具有可能超过其益处的缺陷。目的。探讨在拟合线性回归模型之前转换健康实用响应变量的好处。方法。我们使用多种模型精度测量使用未转化的模型进行比较日志,Logit,Arcsin和Box-Cox转换。我们通过设计和开展模拟研究和来自2个公布研究的分解数据进行了评估,该研究将“映射”对型电流仪器的心理学描述性仪器进行了“映射”。结果。在仿真研究中,在大多数情况下,使用涂抹估计器的对数转换最低偏差,而是最高的差异之一,特别是在小样本大小下估计低实用价值。未转化的模型由转换模型表现优于。调查结果不确定地分析真实数据,其中Arcsin为其中一个数据集发出了最低误差,而未转化的模型对另一个数据集具有最佳性能。结论。我们确定了转型的好处,并为未来的健康公用事业建模提供了建议。然而,益处是温和的,没有单一的转化似乎是普遍的最佳的,这表明选择需要对案例的检查进行检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号