首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Toward a Centralized, Systematic Approach to the Identification, Appraisal, and Use of Health State Utility Values for Reimbursement Decision Making: Introducing the Health Utility Book (HUB)
【24h】

Toward a Centralized, Systematic Approach to the Identification, Appraisal, and Use of Health State Utility Values for Reimbursement Decision Making: Introducing the Health Utility Book (HUB)

机译:朝着报销决策的识别,评估和使用健康状态实用价值观的集中,鉴定和使用的集中,鉴定和使用:介绍卫生效用书(集线器)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a widely recommended form of health economic evaluation worldwide. The outcome measure in CUA is quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), which are calculated using health state utility values (HSUVs) and corresponding life-years. Therefore, HSUVs play a significant role in determining cost-effectiveness. Formal adoption and endorsement of CUAs by reimbursement authorities motivates methodological advancement in HSUV measurement and application. A large body of evidence exploring various methods in measuring HSUVs has accumulated, imposing challenges for investigators in identifying and applying HSUVs to CUAs. First, large variations in HSUVs between studies are often reported, and these may lead to different cost-effectiveness conclusions. Second, issues concerning the quality of studies that generate HSUVs are increasingly highlighted in the literature. This issue is compounded by the limited published guidance and methodological standards for assessing the quality of these studies. Third, reimbursement decision making is a context-specific process. Therefore, while an HSUV study may be of high quality, it is not necessarily appropriate for use in all reimbursement jurisdictions. To address these issues, by promoting a systematic approach to study identification, critical appraisal, and appropriate use, we are developing the Health Utility Book (HUB). The HUB consists of an HSUV registry, a quality assessment tool for health utility studies, and a checklist for interpreting their use in CUAs. We anticipate that the HUB will make a timely and important contribution to the rigorous conduct and proper use of health utility studies for reimbursement decision making. In this way, health care resource allocation informed by HSUVs may reflect the preferences of the public, improve health outcomes of patients, and maintain the efficiency of health care systems.
机译:成本实用性分析(CUA)是全球广泛推荐的健康经济评估形式。 CUA的结果测量是质量调整的寿命年(QALYS),其使用健康状态效用价值(HSUV)和相应的寿命来计算。因此,HSUV在确定成本效益方面发挥着重要作用。偿还当局CuA的正式采用与认可激励了香港富夫测量和应用中的方法。探索衡量水平的各种方法的大量证据积累了,积累了对调查人员识别和应用HSUV的挑战。首先,经常报告研究之间的HSUV的大变化,这些可能会导致不同的成本效益结论。其次,在文献中越来越突出了生成水平的研究质量的问题。该问题是通过有限的发布指导和方法标准进行复合,用于评估这些研究的质量。第三,报销决策是一个特定于背景的过程。因此,虽然HSUV研究可能具有高质量,但它不一定适合于所有报销司法管辖区使用。为了解决这些问题,通过促进系统的方法来研究鉴定,关键评估和适当使用,我们正在开发卫生实用书(集线器)。集线器由HSUV注册表,健康公用事业研究的质量评估工具以及用于解释其在CUA中使用的清单。我们预计枢纽将对严格的行为及适当使用卫生公用事业研究进行及时,对报销决策进行及时的贡献。通过这种方式,HSUV通知的医疗资源分配可能反映公众的偏好,改善患者的健康结果,并保持医疗保健系统的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号