...
首页> 外文期刊>Maternal and child health journal >Neighborhood Disadvantage and Neighborhood Affluence: Associations with Breastfeeding Practices in Urban Areas
【24h】

Neighborhood Disadvantage and Neighborhood Affluence: Associations with Breastfeeding Practices in Urban Areas

机译:邻里缺点和邻里富裕:城市地区母乳喂养实践的协会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To estimate the associations between neighborhood disadvantage and neighborhood affluence with breastfeeding practices at the time of hospital discharge, by race-ethnicity. Methods We geocoded and linked birth certificate data for 111,596 live births in New Jersey in 2006 to census tracts. We constructed indices of neighborhood disadvantage and neighborhood affluence and examined their associations with exclusive (EBF) and any breastfeeding in multilevel models, controlling for individual-level confounders. Results The associations of neighborhood disadvantage and affluence with breastfeeding practices differed by race-ethnicity. The odds of EBF decreased as neighborhood disadvantage increased for all but White women [Asian: Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.97); Black: AOR 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.86); Hispanic: AOR 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.86); White: AOR 0.99 (95% CI 0.91-1.08)]. The odds of EBF increased as neighborhood affluence increased for Hispanic [AOR 1.19 (95% CI 1.08-1.31)] and White [AOR 1.12 (95% CI 1.06-1.18)] women only. The odds of any breastfeeding decreased with increasing neighborhood disadvantage only for Hispanic women [AOR 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92)], and increased for White women [AOR 1.16 (95% CI 1.07-1.26)]. The odds of any breastfeeding increased as neighborhood affluence increased for all except Hispanic women [Asian: AOR 1.31 (95% CI 1.13-1.51); Black: AOR 1.19 (95% CI 1.07-1.32); Hispanic: AOR 1.08 (95% CI 0.99-1.18); White: AOR 1.30 (95% CI 1.24-1.38)]. Conclusions Race-ethnic differences in associations between neighborhood disadvantage and affluence and breastfeeding practices at the time of hospital discharge indicate the need for specialized support to improve access to services.
机译:目的估计围场劣势与邻里富裕在医院排放时母乳喂养施用的协会,采用种族。方法在2006年新泽西州的111,596个活产婴儿出生的方法和联系出生证明书数据。我们构建了社区劣势和邻里富裕的指数,并与多级模型中的任何母乳喂养,控制了各个母乳喂养,控制了个人级别混杂。结果邻里缺点和富裕与母乳喂养实践的协会因种族族不同。随着邻里缺点增加,EBF的几率降低了所有但白人女性[亚洲:调整后的差距(AOR)0.82(95%置信区间(CI)0.69-0.97);黑色:AOR 0.77(95%CI 0.70-0.86);西班牙裔:AOR 0.78(95%CI 0.70-0.86);白色:AOR 0.99(95%CI 0.91-1.08)]。 EBF的几率随着邻里富裕的增加而增加,因为西班牙裔(AOR 1.19(95%CI 1.08-1.31)和白色[AOR 1.12(95%CI 1.06-1.18)]。任何母乳喂养的几率都随着人西班牙裔女性的增加而减少了邻域缺点[AOR 0.85(95%CI 0.79-0.92)],适用于白人女性[AOR 1.16(95%CI 1.07-1.26)]。除非西班牙妇女除邻里富裕增加,任何母乳喂养的几率都会增加[亚洲人:AOR 1.31(95%CI 1.13-1.51);黑色:AOR 1.19(95%CI 1.07-1.32);西班牙裔:AOR 1.08(95%CI 0.99-1.18);白色:AOR 1.30(95%CI 1.24-1.38)]。结论医院卸货时邻里劣势和富裕和母乳喂养行为之间的协会的竞争族差异表明需要专门支持,以改善服务获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号