首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical research letters: MRL >Prognostic Performance of Preoperative Staging: Assessed by Using Multidetector Computed Tomography-Between the New Clinical Classification and the Pathological Classification in the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Gastric Carcinoma
【24h】

Prognostic Performance of Preoperative Staging: Assessed by Using Multidetector Computed Tomography-Between the New Clinical Classification and the Pathological Classification in the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Gastric Carcinoma

机译:术前分期的预后性能:通过使用多票的计算断层摄影 - 新的临床分类与第八届美国癌症分类委员会癌症分类委员会的病理分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Since the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification recently introduced the clinical classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer, the new clinical classification has not been extensively validated yet. Therefore, in this study, we compared the prognostic performance of the new clinical classification and the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Methods We reviewed 3027 patients with gastric cancer who were surgically treated between 2009 and 2013. Patient survival was analyzed according to the preoperative stage by the clinical classification and the pathologic classification in the eighth AJCC classification. The prognostic performance was examined using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value and Harrell c-index. Results Patient survival was significantly different across the different stages when both classifications were used. However, individual pairwise comparisons showed that survival differences between each stage were more distinctive and homogeneous in the pathologic classification. In the multivariate model adjusted for the final pathologic stage, preoperative staging by the pathologic classification was an independent prognostic factor, whereas the clinical classification was not. The pathologic classification showed a lower AIC value compared with the clinical classification (5100.64 vs. 5114.14). The Harrell c-index was higher in the pathologic classification than in the clinical classification (0.741 vs. 0.739). Conclusions The new clinical classification in the eighth AJCC classification discriminates patient survival well. However, it does not appear to have a better prognostic performance compared with the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer.
机译:背景技术自第八届癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分类委员会近期介绍了胃癌术前分期的临床分类,新的临床分类尚未广泛验证。因此,在本研究中,我们比较了新的临床分类的预后性能和胃癌术前分期的病理分类。方法审查了3027例胃癌患者,2009年至2013年在外科疗效。根据术前阶段,通过临床分类和第八次AJCC分类的病理分类进行分析患者存活。使用Akaike信息标准(AIC)值和Harrell C-Indep检验预后性能。结果在使用两种分类时,患者存活率在不同阶段显着差异。然而,单个成对比较表明,在病理分类中,每个阶段之间的存活差异更为独特和均匀。在调整最终病理阶段的多变量模型中,通过病理分类的术前分期是独立的预后因素,而临床分类则不是。与临床分类相比,病理分类显示出较低的AIC值(5100.64对5114.14)。病理分类的哈雷尔C型指数高于临床分类(0.741对0.739)。结论第八次AJCC分类中的新临床分类辨别患者生存良好。然而,与胃癌术前分期的病理分类相比,它并不具有更好的预后性能。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Chonnam Natl Univ Dept Surg Gastr Canc Clin Sch Med Hwasun Gun Jeollanam Do South Korea;

    Chonnam Natl Univ Dept Surg Gastr Canc Clin Sch Med Hwasun Gun Jeollanam Do South Korea;

    Chonnam Natl Univ Dept Surg Gastr Canc Clin Sch Med Hwasun Gun Jeollanam Do South Korea;

    Chonnam Natl Univ Dept Surg Gastr Canc Clin Sch Med Hwasun Gun Jeollanam Do South Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 数学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号