首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical research letters: MRL >A new approach combining a simplified FLEXPART model and a Bayesian-RAT method for forecasting PM10 and PM2.5
【24h】

A new approach combining a simplified FLEXPART model and a Bayesian-RAT method for forecasting PM10 and PM2.5

机译:一种新的方法,将简化的Flexpart模型与PM10和PM2.5预测的贝叶斯 - 大鼠方法相结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we evaluated atmospheric particulate matter (PM) concentration predictions at a regional scale using a simplified Lagrangian particle dispersion modeling system and the Bayesian and multiplicative ratio correction optimization (Bayesian-RAT) method to improve the mixing ratio forecast of PM10 and PM2.5. We first examined the forecast performance of the LPD (i.e., the simplified FLEXPART model combined with the Bayesian-RAT method) by comparing the model predictions with the PM concentration observations from 95 observation stations in Xingtai city and its surrounding areas. The first 2 months (i.e., Oct. and Nov. 2017) of the study period represented the typical spin-up time period, and the analysis period was December 2017. The LPD forecast system was much better (correlation coefficient: R=0.64 vs. 0.48 and 0.67 vs. 0.50 for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively; root mean square error: RMSE = 74.98 vs. 105.96 mu g/m(3) for PM10 and 54.89 vs. 72.81 mu g/m(3) for PM2.5) than the pre-calibration results. We also compared the LPD forecasting model with other models (WRF-Chem and Camx) using data from monitoring stations in Xingtai, China, and the LPD forecasting model had higher accuracy than the other models. In particular, the RMSE scores for hourly PM10 concentrations were reduced by 36.51% and 42.21% compared to WRF-Chem and to Camx, respectively. The PM2.5 forecast results, as in the case of PM10, showed a better performance when applying the LPD model to the data from the monitoring stations. The RMSE was reduced by 26.44% and 18.47% relative to the WRF-Chem and Camx, respectively. The results confirm that there is much advantage of the LPD forecast system for predicting PM and may be for other pollutants.
机译:在本研究中,我们使用简化的拉格朗日粒子分散模型系统和贝叶斯和倍增比率校正优化(贝叶斯 - 大鼠)方法评估了区域规模的大气颗粒物质(PM)浓度预测,以改善PM10和PM2的混合比率预测.5。我们首先通过比较来自邢台市及其周边地区的95个观察站的PM集中观测的模型预测,研究了LPD的预测性能研究期的前2个月(即2017年10月)代表了典型的旋转时间段,分析期为2017年12月。LPD预测系统更好(相关系数:r = 0.64 vs 。PM10和PM2.5分别为0.48和0.67与0.50;根均方误差:PM10和54.89的PM2和54.89 vs.105.96 mu g / m(3)。PM2的54.89毫升(3) .5)比预校准结果。我们还将LPD预测模型与其他模型(WRF-CHEM和CAMX)进行了使用来自邢台,中国邢台的监测站和LPD预测模型的数据比其他型号更高。特别是,与WRF-Chem和CAMX分别减少了每小时PM10浓度的RMSE分数36.51%和42.21%。 PM2.5预测结果,如PM10的情况下,在将LPD模型应用于来自监测站的数据时,表现出更好的性能。 RMSE分别降低了26.44%和18.47%,分别与WRF-Chem和CAMX降低了26.44%和18.47%。结果证实,LPD预测系统预测下午有很大的优势,可能是其他污染物。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mathematical research letters: MRL》 |2020年第2期|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Inst Geog Sciences Chinese Acad Sciences State Key Lab Resources Environm Informat Syst Nat Resources Res 11A Datun Rd Chaoyang Dist Beijing Beijing Peoples R China;

    Inst Geog Sciences Chinese Acad Sciences State Key Lab Resources Environm Informat Syst Nat Resources Res 11A Datun Rd Chaoyang Dist Beijing Beijing Peoples R China;

    Inst Geog Sciences Chinese Acad Sciences State Key Lab Resources Environm Informat Syst Nat Resources Res 11A Datun Rd Chaoyang Dist Beijing Beijing Peoples R China;

    Hebei Xingtai Environm Monitoring Ctr . 998 Pk E St Qiaoxi Dist Xingtai Hebei Province Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 数学;
  • 关键词

    PM2; 5; PM10; forecast; simplified FLEXPART model; score analysis; Bayesian-RAT;

    机译:PM2;5;PM10;预测;简化的Flexpart模型;得分分析;贝叶斯大鼠;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号