首页> 外文期刊>Focus on autism and other developmental disabilities. >Examining the Reliability and Validity of the Supports Intensity Scale–Children’s Version in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disability
【24h】

Examining the Reliability and Validity of the Supports Intensity Scale–Children’s Version in Children With Autism and Intellectual Disability

机译:检查患有自闭症和智力残疾儿童的支持强度级别儿童版的可靠性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study compared the reliability, validity, and measurement properties of the Supports Intensity Scale–Children’s Version (SIS-C) in children with autism and intellectual disability ( n = 2,124) and children with intellectual disability only ( n = 1,861). The results suggest that SIS-C is a valid and reliable tool in both populations. Furthermore, the results of multi-group confirmatory factor analyses suggest that measurement invariance can be established across the two groups but that latent differences are present. Specifically, children with autism and intellectual disability tend to have higher intensities of support needs in social activities across age cohorts (5- to 6-, 7- to 8-, 9- to 10-, 11- to 12-, 13- to 14, and 15- to 16-year-olds), and children with intellectual disability only tended to have stronger correlations among support need domains measured on the SIS-C. Implications for applying the SIS-C to assessment and support planning are described.
机译:本研究比较了患有自闭症和智力残疾儿童(N = 2,124)和智力残疾儿童的儿童的可靠性,有效性和测量特性(N = 1,861)。 结果表明,SIS-C在两个人口中是一个有效且可靠的工具。 此外,多组验证因子分析结果表明,可以跨两组建立测量不变性,但存在潜在差异。 具体而言,患有自闭症和智力残疾的儿童往往在跨年龄群组中的社会活动中的支持需求更高强度(5-至6-,7-8,9-10,11至12-,13至12 - 。 14和15至16岁),并且智障残疾儿童仅趋于在SIS-C上测量的支持需求结构域之间具有更强的相关性。 描述了对应用SIS-C进行评估和支持计划的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号