首页> 外文期刊>European neurology >Patients Who Attend Alone at a First Memory Consultation: Are They a Specific Population,or Is It an Instance of Confounding Bias?
【24h】

Patients Who Attend Alone at a First Memory Consultation: Are They a Specific Population,or Is It an Instance of Confounding Bias?

机译:在第一个内存咨询中单独参加的患者:是否是特定的人口,或者是一个混淆偏见的例子?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As commonly happens in epidemiological research, none of the reported studies were totally free of methodological problems. Studies have considered the influence of social relationships on dementia, but the mechanisms underlying these associations are not perfectly understood. We look at the possible impact of selection bias. For their first memory consultation, patients may come alone or accompanied by a relative. Our objective is to better understand the impact of this factor by retrospective follow-up of geriatric memory outpatients over several years. All patients over 70 who were referred to Bretonneau Memory Clinic for the first time, between January 2006 and 2018, were included in the study. The patients who came alone formed group 1, the others, whatever type of relative accompanied them, formed group 2. We compared the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores of patients; and for all patients who came twice for consultation with at least a 60-day interval, we compared their first MMSE with the MMSE performed at the second consultation. In total, 2,935 patients were included, aged 79.7 +/- 8.4 years. Six hundred and twenty-five formed group 1 and 2,310 group 2. We found a significant difference in MMSE scores between the 2 groups of patients; and upon second consultation in group 2, but that difference was minor in group 1. Our finding of a possible confounding factor underlines the complexity of choosing comparison groups in order to minimize selection bias while maintaining clinical relevance.
机译:随着流行病学研究中的常见,报告的研究都没有完全没有方法问题。研究考虑了社会关系对痴呆症的影响,但这些协会的基础机制并不完全理解。我们看看选择偏差的可能影响。对于他们的第一个内存咨询,患者可能独自一人或伴随着相对。我们的目标是通过回顾性的老年记忆门诊在几年内更好地了解这一因素的影响。在2006年和2018年1月期间,所有70岁以上的患者均在2006年1月至2018年在研究中纳入。独居患者组成的群体1,其他,其他类型,无论是什么类型的相对相对,形成组2.我们比较了患者的迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)分数;对于所有与至少60天的间隔进行两次进行两次进行两次咨询的患者,我们将首次MMSE与第二次咨询执行的MMSE进行了比较。总共包括2,935名患者,年龄79.7 +/- 8.4岁。六百二十五组成立组1和2,310组2.我们发现2组患者之间的MMSE评分有显着差异;在第2组第二次磋商后,差异在群体中较小。我们发现可能的混淆因子强调了选择比较群体的复杂性,以最大限度地减少临床相关性的选择偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号