首页> 外文期刊>Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine >Toward more reliable measurements of NOE NOE effects in CEST CEST spectra at around ?1.6?ppm ( NOE NOE (?1.6)) in rat brain
【24h】

Toward more reliable measurements of NOE NOE effects in CEST CEST spectra at around ?1.6?ppm ( NOE NOE (?1.6)) in rat brain

机译:在Cest Cest光谱中更可靠地测量NETE CEST光谱在大鼠大脑中的CEST CEST光谱中的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose Recently, a new relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) saturation transfer effect at around ?1.6 parts per million, termed NOE(?1.6) , and its potential applications in tumor and stroke were reported by several institutes. However, there is a concern of the reproducibility of NOE(?1.6) measurements because it is not reported by many other publications. This paper aims to study the influence of typically overlooked experimental settings on the NOE(?1.6) signal and to build a framework for more reliable measurements of NOE(?1.6) at 9.4T. Methods Z‐spectra were obtained in rat brains. A fitting approach was performed to quantify all known saturation transfer effects except NOE(?1.6). Residual signals were obtained by removing these confounding effects from Z‐spectra and were then used to quantify NOE(?1.6). Multislice imaging was performed to study the NOE(?1.6) dependence on brain regions. The influences of euthanasia, anesthesia, breathing gases, and RF irradiation power were also evaluated. Results Results demonstrate that the NOE(?1.6) signal contributions are often not clearly observable in raw Z‐spectra at relatively high irradiation powers due to, for example, the direct water saturation effect, but they can be visualized after removing other nonspecific effects. In addition, the NOE(?1.6) effect depends on brain region, decreases postmortem, shifts after long‐duration anesthesia, and may be enhanced by increasing O 2 and N 2 O breathing air concentrations. Conclusion Because the NOE(?1.6) effect is more susceptible to the direct water saturation effect and more sensitive to physiological conditions than are other CEST effects, incorporating known sensitivities into the experimental design and data analysis is necessary to ensure more reliable NOE(?1.6) results.
机译:目的近来,新的核传递者增强(NOE)饱和转移效果(NOE)饱和转移效果?每百万百万分之一,若干机构报告了肿瘤和中风中的肿瘤和中风中的潜在应用。然而,缺点(?1.6)测量的再现性有担忧,因为许多其他出版物没有报道。本文旨在研究常见于NOE(α1.6)信号上的常见实验设置的影响,并在9.4T时建立更可靠的NOE(?1.6)的框架。方法在大鼠大脑中获得Z光谱。进行拟合方法以量化除NOE(?1.6)之外的所有已知的饱和传递效果。通过从Z光谱中除去这些混杂效应来获得残留信号,然后用于量化NOE(α1.6)。进行多层成像以研究NOE(?1.6)对脑区的依赖性。还评估了安乐死,麻醉,呼吸气体和RF照射功率的影响。结果表明,由于直接水饱和效应,NOE(α1.6)信号贡献通常在原始Z光谱中常见于原始Z光谱,但在除去其他非特异性效应后,它们可以可视化。此外,NOE(α1.6)效果取决于脑区域,减少后期后,在长持续时间麻醉后移位,并且可以通过增加O 2和N 2 O呼吸空气浓度来增强。结论是因为NOE(α1.6)效果更容易受到直接水饱和效果的影响,对生理条件更敏感,而不是其他CEST效应,将已知的敏感性纳入实验设计和数据分析,以确保更可靠的NOE(?1.6 ) 结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号