...
首页> 外文期刊>Magnetic resonance in medical sciences: MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine >Histological Grading of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion- weighted Imaging: Inconsistent Results Depending on the Fitting Method
【24h】

Histological Grading of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion- weighted Imaging: Inconsistent Results Depending on the Fitting Method

机译:肝细胞癌组织学分级与椎间杂环相连运动扩散加权成像:不一致的结果,取决于配件方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the abilities of three intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging approximation methods to discriminate the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Methods: Fifty-eight patients (60 HCCs) underwent IVIM imaging with 11 b-values (0-1000 s/mm(2)). Slow (D) and fast diffusion coefficients (D*) and the perfusion fraction (f) were calculated for the HCCs using the mean signal intensities in regions of interest drawn by two radiologists. Three approximation methods were used. First, all three parameters were obtained simultaneously using non-linear fitting (method A). Second, D was obtained using linear fitting (b = 500 and 1000), followed by non-linear fitting for D* and f (method B). Third, D was obtained by linear fitting, f was obtained using the regression line intersection and signals at b = 0, and non-linear fitting was used for D* (method C). A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to reveal the abilities of these methods to distinguish poorly-differentiated from well-to-moderately-differentiated HCCs. Inter-reader agreements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: The measurements of D, D*, and f in methods B and C (Az-value, 0.658-0.881) had better discrimination abilities than did those in method A (Az-value, 0.527-0.607). The ICCs of D and f were good to excellent (0.639-0.835) with all methods. The ICCs of D* were moderate with methods B (0.580) and C (0.463) and good with method A (0.705). Conclusion: The IVIM parameters may vary depending on the fitting methods, and therefore, further technical refinement may be needed.
机译:目的:比较三种椎间内杂环运动(IVIM)成像近似方法的能力,以区分肝细胞癌(HCCS)的组织学等级。方法:五十八名患者(60 hCCs)接受IVIM成像,11b值(0-1000 s / mm(2))。使用由两个放射科医师绘制的感兴趣区域中的平均信号强度计算HCC,计算慢(D)和快速扩散系数(D *)和灌注分数(F)。使用了三种近似方法。首先,使用非线性配件同时获得所有三个参数(方法A)。第二,使用线性配件(B = 500和1000)获得D,然后用于D *和F的非线性拟合(方法B)。第三,D通过线性配件获得,使用回归线交叉点和B = 0的信号获得,并且使用非线性配件D *(方法C)。进行接收器操作特征分析以揭示这些方法的能力区分从良好良好的分化的HCCs差异。使用Intelaclass相关系数(ICC)评估读/际协议。结果:D,D *和F的测量方法B和C(AZ值,0.658-0.881)具有比方法A(AZ值,0.527-0.607)的更好的辨别能力。 D和F的ICCS与所有方法都好(0.639-0.835)。 D *的ICCS与方法B(0.580)和C(0.463)和良好的方法A(0.705)。结论:IVIM参数可以根据配件方法而变化,因此,可能需要进一步的技术细化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号