...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology research and practice >Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Crohn’s Disease
【24h】

Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Crohn’s Disease

机译:中性粒细胞对淋巴细胞比和血小板对淋巴细胞比在CROHN病中的诊断价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and non-CD controls. These ratios were all derived from complete blood counts. Two hundred and six participants including CD inpatients and non-CD controls were retrospectively enrolled. We found statistically higher NLR and PLR and lower LMR in CD patients than in non-CD controls (all P<0.01). However, NMR was not different between the two groups (P=0.18). In addition, NLR, PLR, and LMR were associated with CRP and ESR. Optimal cutoffs for NLR and PLR were 2.72 (sensitivity: 68.3%, specificity: 75.9%, and overall accuracy: 70.1%) and 132.88 (sensitivity: 76.7%, specificity: 84.8%, and overall accuracy: 80.8%), respectively. In conclusion, the NLR and PLR might be effective, readily available, and low-cost biomarkers for differentiating CD patients from non-CD controls.
机译:本研究的目的是研究中性粒细胞对淋巴细胞比(NLR),中性粒细胞对单核细胞比(NMR),淋巴细胞对单核细胞比(LMR)和血小板到淋巴细胞比率的诊断疗效( PLR)在克罗恩病(CD)和非CD对照中的患者中。这些比率均来自完全血液计数。回顾性地注册了两百六位参与者,包括CD住院患者和非CD控制。我们在CD患者中发现了统计学上更高的NLR和PLR和下部LMR,而不是在非CD对照中(所有P <0.01)。然而,两组之间的NMR在(P = 0.18)之间没有差异。此外,NLR,PLR和LMR与CRP和ESR相关。 NLR和PLR的最佳截止值为2.72(灵敏度:68.3%,特异性:75.9%,总体准确性:70.1%)和132.88(敏感度:76.7%,特异性:84.8%和总体准确性:80.8%)。总之,NLR和PLR可能是有效的,容易获得的,低成本的生物标志物,用于区分非CD对照的CD患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号