...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >An Endoscopic Transluminal Approach, Compared With Minimally Invasive Surgery, Reduces Complications and Costs for Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis
【24h】

An Endoscopic Transluminal Approach, Compared With Minimally Invasive Surgery, Reduces Complications and Costs for Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis

机译:与微创手术相比,内窥镜腔室方法减少了恶性化胰腺炎患者的并发症和成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infected necrotizing pancreatitis is a highly morbid disease with poor outcomes. Intervention strategies have progressed from open necrosectomy to minimally invasive approaches. We compared outcomes of minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic approaches for patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. METHODS: We performed a single-center, randomized trial of 66 patients with confirmed or suspected infected necrotizing pancreatitis who required intervention from May 12, 2014, through March 24, 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to groups that received minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement, depending on location of collection, n = 32) or an endoscopic step-up approach (transluminal drainage with or without necrosectomy, n = 34). The primary endpoint was a composite of major complications (new-onset multiple organ failure, new-onset systemic dysfunction, enteral or pancreatic-cutaneous fistula, bleeding and perforation of a visceral organ) or death during 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 11.8% of patients who received the endoscopic procedure and 40.6% of patients who received the minimally invasive surgery (risk ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.80; P = .007). Although there was no significant difference in mortality (endoscopy 8.8% vs surgery 6.3%; P = .999), none of the patients assigned to the endoscopic approach developed enteral or pancreatic-cutaneous fistulae compared with 28.1% of the patients who underwent surgery (P = .001). The mean number of major complications per patient was significantly higher in the surgery group (0.69 +/- 1.03) compared with the endoscopy group (0.15 +/- 0.44) (P = .007). The physical health scores for quality of life at 3 months was better with the endoscopic approach (P = .039) and mean total cost was lower ($75,830) compared with $117,492 for surgery (P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of 66 patients, an endoscopic transluminal approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis, compared with minimally invasive surgery, significantly reduced major complications, lowered costs, and increased quality of life. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02084537
机译:背景与目标:感染坏死性胰腺炎是一种高度病态的结果,结果不佳。干预策略从开放的坏死切除术中取得了微创方法。我们比较了最微创手术的结果与受感染坏死性胰腺炎的患者的内窥镜方法。方法:我们进行了单中心,随机试验66名患者的确诊或疑似的坏死性胰腺炎,他们从2014年5月12日,2017年3月24日所需的干预。患者被随机分配给接受最微创手术的组(腹腔镜或腹腔镜或视频辅助腹膜内穿清创,取决于收集的位置,n = 32)或内窥镜升压方法(具有或没有墓穴切除术的转差引流,n = 34)。主要终点是主要并发症的复合物(新发病多器官衰竭,新发病系统功能障碍,肠内或胰腺皮瘘,内脏器官的出血和穿孔)或在6个月的随访期间死亡。结果:11.8%的患者发生的主要终点,接受内窥镜手术的患者和40.6%的接受最微创手术的患者(风险比0.29; 95%置信区间0.11-0.80; p = .007)。虽然死亡率没有显着差异(内窥镜检查8.8%VS手术6.3%; P = .999),但分配给内窥镜方法的患者没有开发出肠道或胰腺皮瘘,而28.1%接受手术的患者( p = .001)。与内窥镜检查组(0.15 +/- 0.44)相比,手术组(0.69 +/- 1.03)的手术组(0.69 +/- 1.03)的平均数目明显高(0.15 +/- 0.44)(p = .007)。 3个月的生活质量的身体健康评分与内窥镜方法更好(P = .039),平均成本较低(75,830美元),而手术为117,492美元(P = .039)。结论:在66名患者的随机试验中,具有针对坏死性胰腺炎的内窥镜分子方法,与微创手术相比,显着减少了重症并发症,降低了成本,提高了生活质量。 ClinicalTrials.gov No:NCT02084537

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号