...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Five years of REDD plus governance: The use of market mechanisms as a response to anthropogenic climate change
【24h】

Five years of REDD plus governance: The use of market mechanisms as a response to anthropogenic climate change

机译:五年的红外加理:利用市场机制作为对人为气候变化的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Forest ecosystems worldwide are increasingly subjected to human intervention, leading commentators to argue that forests should be viewed.as anthropogenic ecosystems. REDD+ is an emerging inter-governmental policy instrument aimed at both reducing deforestation and forest degradation and combatting climate change, whereby developed countries pay developing countries to reduce their forest-based emissions. The paper details a five-year research project to evaluate REDD+ quality of governance and develop governance standards for the mechanism. Quality of governance was evaluated in five key international institutional elements: the REDD+ related negotiations in the global climate talks; the support and funding agencies UN-REDD, Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), Forest Investment Programme (FIP) and the REDD+ Partnership. This research was complemented by national level governance assessments and related standards setting initiatives in Nepal and Papua New Guinea. The researchers conclude that REDD+ confronts a number of challenges, notably around resources for capacity building, and benefit sharing. In addition, the lack of provisions for changing behaviour and solving the problem of forest-based emissions in the current safeguards render them inadequate to the task of delivering quality of governance. In the absence of consistent governance standards, REDD+ will only partially be successful in combatting climate change in the Anthropocene. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:世界范围内的森林生态系统越来越受到人类干预,领导评论员应争辩说森林应该被观察。人类学生态系统。 REDD +是一个新兴政府间政策仪器,旨在减少森林砍伐和森林退化,并打击气候变化,由此发达国家支付发展中国家以减少基于林的排放。本文详细介绍了一项为期五年的研究项目,以评估REDD +治理质量,并为该机制制定治理标准。治理质量在五个关键的国际机构内容中评估:全球气候谈判中的红德+相关谈判;支持和资助机构联合国红,森林碳伙伴关系(FCPF),森林投资计划(FIP)和Redd +伙伴关系。该研究由国家层面治理评估和尼泊尔和巴布亚新几内亚的相关标准制定举措补充。研究人员得出结论,红+ +面对许多挑战,特别是围绕能力建设的资源,以及利益分享。此外,缺乏用于改变行为和解决当前保障中的森林排放问题的规定使他们不足以提供治理质量的任务。在没有一致的治理标准的情况下,REDD +只会成功地将气候变化发生在乌培中的气候变化。 (c)2016年Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号