...
首页> 外文期刊>Gynecological endocrinology: the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology >Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer on the 5th or 7th day of progesterone supplementation in an artificial cycle: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer on the 5th or 7th day of progesterone supplementation in an artificial cycle: a randomised controlled trial

机译:玻璃化温热的胚泡转移在人造循环中孕酮补充的第5或第7天:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Prospective studies comparing different durations of progesterone supplementation before transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts in an artificial cycle are lacking. However, in oocyte donation programmes, the sporadic available evidence demonstrates considerable differences in clinical pregnancy rates according to the duration of progesterone administration. This randomised controlled trial (RCT), included 303 patients undergoing a frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) of one or two vitrified-warmed blastocyst(s) in an artificial cycle. Randomisation was performed when the endometrial thickness reached 7mm after oestrogen supplementation. One hundred and fifty two patients in group A received 7d of vaginal micronised progesterone tablets and 151 patients in group B received 5d of micronised vaginal progesterone before FET. No differences were seen in clinical pregnancy rate between both groups: 42/152 (27.6%) in group A versus 49/151 (32.5%) in group B. Although no statistically significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rates, our study was powered to detect an absolute difference of 16%. In this regard, we cannot exclude that smaller, clinically relevant differences might exist and our study did not have the power to detect this. Patients were also not blinded for the intervention, causing a potential bias.
机译:缺乏前瞻性研究,比较普通孕酮补充剂在人工循环中玻璃化胚泡前的不同持续时间。然而,在卵母细胞捐赠计划中,零星可用的证据表明,根据黄体酮给药的持续时间,临床妊娠率的显着差异。该随机对照试验(RCT)包括在人造循环中经历一个或两个玻璃化温胚囊的冷冻胚胎转移(FET)的303名患者。当雌激素补充后的子宫内膜厚度达到7mm时进行随机化。一百五十二名患者在A组接受的7D阴道微粉化孕酮片剂和151例B组患者接受5D在FET之前的5D微生物阴道孕酮。两组之间的临床妊娠率没有差异,B组中A组的42/152(27.6%)。虽然在临床怀孕率中没有观察到统计学上有统计学差异,但我们的研究得到了动力检测到16%的绝对差异。在这方面,我们不能排除那个较小的,临床相关差异可能存在,我们的研究没有能力来检测这一点。患者也没有让干预蒙蔽,导致潜在的偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号