...
首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement
【24h】

Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement

机译:改善不孕症治疗临床试验的报告(印记):修改联盟陈述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Clinical trials testing infertility treatments often do not report on the major outcomes of interest to patients and clinicians and the public (such as live birth) nor on the harms, including maternal risks during pregnancy and fetal anomalies. This is complicated by the multiple participants in infertility trials which may include a woman (mother), a man (father), and a third individual if successful, their offspring (child), who is also the desired outcome of treatment. The primary outcome of interest and many adverse events occur after cessation of infertility treatment and during pregnancy and the puerperium, which creates a unique burden of follow-up for clinical trial investigators and participants. In 2013, because of the inconsistencies in trial reporting and the unique aspects of infertility trials not adequately addressed by existing Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statements, we convened a consensus conference in Harbin, China, with the aim of planning modifications to the CONSORT checklist to improve the quality of reporting of clinical trials testing infertility treatment. The consensus group recommended that the preferred primary outcome of all infertility trials is live birth (defined as any delivery of a live infant after >= 20 weeks' gestation) or cumulative live birth, defined as the live birth per women over a defined time period (or number of treatment cycles). In addition, harms to all participants should be systematically collected and reported, including during the intervention, any resulting pregnancy, and the neonatal period. Routine information should be collected and reported on both male and female participants in the trial. We propose to track the change in quality that these guidelines may produce in published trials testing infertility treatments. Our ultimate goal is to increase the transparency of benefits and risks of infertility treatments to provide better medical care to affected individuals and couples. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
机译:临床试验测试不孕症治疗通常不会报告患者和临床医生和公众(如活产)的主要结果,也没有关于妊娠期间产妇风险的危害和胎儿。这对不孕症试验中的多个参与者复杂化,这可能包括一个女人(母亲),一个男人(父亲)和第三个人,如果成功,他们的后代(儿童)也是治疗的所需结果。兴趣和许多不良事件的主要结果发生在不孕症治疗和怀孕期间和孕产病后发生,这为临床试验者和参与者带来了独特的跟进负担。 2013年,由于审判报告的不一致和未经统一的综合审判标准(共配)陈述的不育的无畏试验的独特方面,我们召开了中国哈尔滨的一项协商一致意见,目的是对哈尔滨进行修改联盟清单以提高临床试验检测不孕治疗的报告质量。共识组建议所有不孕症试验的首发初级结果是活产出(定义为在妊娠妊娠的妊娠)或累积活婴儿的任何递送)或累积的活生生,定义为每位妇女的患者在定义的时间段内(或治疗周期数)。此外,应系统地收集和报告对所有参与者的危害,包括在干预期间,任何导致怀孕和新生儿期间。应收集常规信息并报告试验中的男性和女性参与者。我们建议追踪这些准则可能在出版的试验中产生的质量的变化,测试不孕症治疗。我们的最终目标是增加不孕症治疗的益处和风险的透明度,为受影响的个人和夫妻提供更好的医疗保健。 (c)2014年美国生殖医学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号