首页> 外文期刊>Early intervention in psychiatry >Healthcare utilization costs of emerging adults with mood and anxiety disorders in an early intervention treatment program compared to a matched cohort
【24h】

Healthcare utilization costs of emerging adults with mood and anxiety disorders in an early intervention treatment program compared to a matched cohort

机译:与匹配的队列相比,早期干预治疗计划中新兴成人的医疗利用费用和焦虑症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Aim The First Episode Mood and Anxiety Disorder Program (FEMAP) provides treatment to emerging adults with mood and anxiety disorders in an accessible, youth‐friendly environment. We sought to investigate FEMAP's impact on the costs of care. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of one‐year health service costs using linked administrative datasets to compare emerging adults treated at FEMAP (FEMAP users) to propensity‐score matched controls (non‐users). Costs from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care, included drug benefit claims, inpatient, physician and ambulatory care services. We used bootstrapping to perform unadjusted comparisons between FEMAP users and non‐users, by cost category and overall. We performed risk‐adjusted comparison of overall costs using generalized estimating equations. Results FEMAP users (n?=?366) incurred significantly lower costs compared to non‐users (n?=?660), for inpatient services (?$784, 95% confidence interval [CI] ?$1765, ?$28), ambulatory care services (?$90, 95% CI ?$175, ?$14) and drug benefit claims (?$47, 95% CI ‐$115,‐$4) and significantly higher physician services costs ($435, 95% CI $276, $581) over 1 year. The unadjusted difference in overall costs was not significant (?$853, 95% CI ?$2048, $142). Following adjustment for age, sex and age at first mental health diagnosis, the difference of ?$914 (95% CI (?$2747, $919)) was also not significant. Conclusions FEMAP was associated with significantly lower costs of inpatient and ambulatory care services, and higher costs of physician services, however we are unable to conclude that FEMAP is cost‐saving overall.
机译:旨在第一集情绪和焦虑症计划(FEMAP)为新兴成年人提供了可通往的青年友好环境中的情绪和焦虑障碍的治疗。我们试图调查Femap对护理费用的影响。方法采用链接的行政数据集对一年的卫生服务成本进行了回顾性的观察研究,以将新兴成年人与股息(汇编用户)进行比较,以促进匹配控制(非用户)。从安大略省卫生部和长期护理部的角度来看,包括药物福利索赔,住院病人,医生和守护护理服务。我们使用举止通过成本类别和总体执行Femap用户和非用户之间的未经调整的比较。我们使用广义估算方程式执行风险调整的总成本比较。结果FEMAP用户(N?= 366)与非用户相比,成本明显降低了服务(95%,95%CI?175美元,?14美元)和药物福利索赔(?47美元,95%CI - 115美元,4美元,4美元),并且在1年内有明显更高的医生服务费用(435美元,95%CI $ 276,581美元) 。整体成本的未经调整的差异并不重要(853美元,95%CI?$ 2048,142美元)。在调整年龄,性和年龄在第一心理健康诊断后,差异为914美元(95%CI(?2747美元,919美元))也不重要。结论FEMAP与住院患者和救护服务的成本明显降低,以及医师服务的成本更高,但我们无法得出结论,股息整体上是节省成本的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号