...
首页> 外文期刊>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology: Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Opthalmologie >First aid therapy for corrosive chemical eye burns: results of a 30-year longitudinal study with two different decontamination concepts
【24h】

First aid therapy for corrosive chemical eye burns: results of a 30-year longitudinal study with two different decontamination concepts

机译:用于腐蚀性化学眼的急救疗法燃烧:具有两种不同的去污概念的30年纵向研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PurposeThere is currently uncertainty about the most efficacious decontamination solution for corrosive chemical eye burns. This 30-year longitudinal study evaluated the relative efficacy of two different decontamination methods. Passive decontamination consists of rinsing with tap water, 0.9% normal saline, isotonic buffered phosphate solution, or Ringer's lactate. Active decontamination adds an amphoteric, polyvalent, and chelating component with Previn (R) (Diphoterine (R)) solution (Laboratoire Prevor, Valmondois, France).MethodsA prospective evaluation of patients treated in two specialized eye clinics for eye burns was begun in 1988. Recorded data included exposure circumstances, type of corrosive, different types of first therapy, and clinical treatment and outcome. Patients were treated from clinic admission and up to 24h after the corrosive chemical burn with rinsing for 15min using two different protocols. From 1988 to 2005, sterile 0.9% normal saline or Ringer's lactate was used. Since 2006, sterile, hypertonic, amphoteric Previn (R) solution was used. Comparative statistical analysis was done with the Fisher contingency tables and Wilcoxon tests.ResultsThere were a total of 1495 patients with 2194 chemically burned eyes. In 1988-2005, the annual incidence was 66.1/year; in 2006-2017, it was 65.5/year. Similar incidences were noted when initial rinsing was with tap water or isotonic buffered phosphate solutions. There was a significantly more severe outcome of corrosive chemical eye burns with any first aid rinsing solutions other than Previn (R) solution or tap water was used (p<0.001). Previn (R) solution or tap water rinsing in the pre-hospital setting and secondary rinsing with Previn (R) solution in the hospital decreased lesion severity in comparison with all other rinsing solutions (p<0.001).ConclusionThe frequency of corrosive chemical eye burns was comparatively high despite tightening of occupational health and safety regulations over the past 30years. The severity of corrosive chemical eye burns has been dramatically decreased since the introduction of Previn (R) solution for initial and secondary rinsing. A new protocol for immediate Previn (R) solution use by the Cologne Fire Brigade and secondary Previn (R) solution rinsing in hospital has reduced the frequency of severe corrosive chemical eye burns to less than 60% as compared to the period of 1988-2005 when other rinsing solutions were utilized.
机译:PurposeThere目前关于腐蚀性化学眼烧伤最有效的去污解决方案的不确定性。这项30年的纵向研究评估了两种不同的去污方法的相对功效。被动净化包括用自来水冲洗,0.9%正常盐水,等渗缓冲磷酸盐溶液或林格氏乳酸盐。活性净化加入两性,多价和螯合组分,具有预期(R)(Diphoterine(R))溶液(Laboratoire Pervor,Valmondois,France)。1988年开始对两种专业眼科诊所治疗的患者进行治疗的患者的前瞻性评估。记录数据包括暴露情况,腐蚀性型,不同类型的第一疗法,以及临床治疗和结果。使用两种不同的方案,在腐蚀性化学燃烧后,从临床入学和腐蚀性化学燃烧后达到24小时,患者患者。从1988年到2005年,使用无菌0.9%甘蔗或林晶酸乳酸。自2006年以来,使用无菌,高渗,两性预数(R)溶液。对比较统计分析是用Fisher应急表和Wilcoxon Tests进行的。结果总共有1495名化学烧伤的眼睛患者。 1988 - 2005年,年发病率为66.1 /年; 2006 - 2017年,这是65.5 /年。当初始漂洗具有自来水或等渗缓冲磷酸盐溶液时,注意到类似的事件。除了前一(r)溶液或自来水以外的任何急救漂洗溶液,腐蚀性化学眼睛燃烧的显着更严重的结果是更严重的腐蚀性化学眼睛燃烧的重大结果(p <0.001)。前一(r)溶液或自来水在院前设定和次级冲洗与前一次漂洗溶液(P <0.001)相比,病变严重程度降低了病变严重程度(P <0.001)。结论腐蚀性化学眼烧伤的频率尽管过去30年在过去的30年收紧职业健康和安全法规,但相对较高。自初始和二次冲洗的预期(R)溶液引入以来,腐蚀性化学眼烧伤的严重程度显着降低。通过古龙火旅行和二级前一型(R)解决方案的新协议和医院中的次级溶液漂洗的液体漂洗降低了严重腐蚀性化学眼烧伤的频率,而不是1988-2005期间的频率低于60%当使用其他漂洗溶液时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号